Re: [Wicket-user] wicket library abused

2006-01-27 Thread Gwyn Evans
You do need membership! Unfortunately, the bot's are now able to automatically look for the Create Account options to do so - There's some attempt at edit verification in place, which is catching some of it, but it's not getting it all... /Gwyn On 26/01/06, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket library abused

2006-01-27 Thread Gwyn Evans
Yes - it was just when I did set it up, I think that you I were the only Wiki users! It's not been left for any reason, just until recently I'd not appreciated that admins got any extra facilities that were actually needed... The main thing I need to know is the Wiki usernames - I've added

[Wicket-user] wicket library abused

2006-01-26 Thread Frank Silbermann
It looks as though someone is determined to make us require membership to edit the Wicket Wiki. Someone just entered a bunch of spam at the top of the Wiki homepage. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket library abused

2006-01-26 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
I forgot to mention: any help is very much appreciated. Juergen On 1/26/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks for the information. Only Gwyn and Eelco are admins with the possibility for rollback (and add the user name to the black list). But you can still manually revert the

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket library abused

2006-01-26 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
thanks for the information. Only Gwyn and Eelco are admins with the possibility for rollback (and add the user name to the black list). But you can still manually revert the changes and inform the list and thus help in keeping the wiki clean. Juergen On 1/26/06, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL