Agreed - I'm honestly not concerned with supporting the portlets JSR,
I don't see the benefit outside of being able to claim
interoperability - and what good is it if it's that much more
complicated to develop against. I was thinking more along the lines
of feature-competitive rather than
I would pick onAttach, but onBeforeRender is fine too. Validation is
not executed before the next request anyway. It doesn't look as nice
as it will look in 2.0, but it works, and there is not much wrong
with it really.
Eelco
On Jun 15, 2006, at 7:44 PM, smallufo wrote:
Thanks.
It
I think you really should implement all those cross frame links as
bookmarkable pages. It is inherently a problem of frames behaving
like browser windows having their own history etc. Each frame should
go into their own page map, and I think the only way you can achieve
that is through
Yep. Though we are limited in what we can except for extensions as we
agreed on keeping the licence ASF 2 for that. Set something up in
wicket-stuff if you want. I think the bottle neck to really make such
a thing flying is someone taking charge and putting a lot of energy in
it to make it succeed
I don't know if you still follow this thread. Maybe you're waiting for an
alert. That's why I reply to one of your mails so that you are notified
about the propose solution further down the thread.
--
View this message in context:
typically, no. I'll regularly re-deploy (through myeclipse), drag/drop into test, and then drag/drop into production. If I've had enough exceptions to make the server go on the fritz I may have to reboot it once and a while.
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:09 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
yeah,
You would either use ajax polling, or what they now call 'Comet
style', which I haven't been experimenting with.
Eelco
On 6/14/06, Peter Neubauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to let a page react to events from the server, e.g. hardware
events. Is it possible to update/change pages
More on wicket widgets,Now how powerful is the RenderedDynamicImageResource System?Because from what i am thinking, isnt it possible to leverage the map tag in HTML specs to make small widgets?
How nice can it get and as a rough thought sketch...we haveimg name=menuWidget src="" width=500
Hey all, was just checking out HEAD to give the new 2.0 stuf a run through and noticed that wicket-spring now has a dependency on wicket-extensions (not declared in pom.xml thou).Design or has someone been playing to-quick-refactoring?
[INFO] Compilation
We weren't only eating Tapas... I drank a lot of wine. That must have
blurred my memory a bit :)
Cool Johan. So my hunch is that Links can be done in the same fashion?
Though we should draw the line somewhere too.
Eelco
On 6/14/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WHAT! you have to
OK, I've reset the spam-traps again - If you want to stay out of them then:
a) Don't use Offline Explorer. [1]
b) Don't use Opera. [2]
More...
[1] When I have some spare time, I'll try have a go with some apps
such as that to see if they can use used without triggering the traps
and
If you're running this on a headless box, you might need the headless option to the app server's JVM:-Djava.awt.headless=true
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Hi All
There is any Menu submenu component like swing in Wicket
Regarads
Gangadhar
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Just a heads up for anyone playing with HEAD/Wicket 2.0, one sneaky little trap I just found is that the Model class has changed its method signature from: public Object getObject(Component component)to
public Object getObject();Anywhere I was extending Model this tripped up silently by -adding-
Its you guys fault :) , you guys made something so wonderful that keeps sparking creativity in people :)aah eelco, its okay...i feel the pressure on you guys anyway and we hope to bring in our support. Wicket deserves a community. Infact because of wicket, i have gone to register in
sf.net so
Hey everybody,
Ive followed a few discussions here on dependency
injection and when I was visiting the Spring 2.0 presentation at J-Spring in
the Netherlands
there was one new feature that really drew my attention.
Spring 2.0 offers support for dependency injection into
domain
Hey,
I was there as well, and I agree with you.
This could be the solution to all wicket-spring integration problems. Now for
someone to actually try it
Tom
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michiel Trimpe
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:00
PM
do you package it up before you deploy it?-IgorOn 6/16/06, VGJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
typically, no. I'll regularly re-deploy (through myeclipse), drag/drop into test, and then drag/drop into production. If I've had enough exceptions to make the server go on the fritz I may have to
Take a look at wicket-contrib-navmenu. If it is not what you want, it
might give you some ideas on how to build one yourself.
Eelco
On Jun 16, 2006, at 3:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
There is any Menu submenu component like swing in Wicket
Regarads
Gangadhar
not yet, but you are welcome to contribute one :)-IgorOn 6/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi AllThere is any Menu submenu component like swing in WicketRegaradsGangadhar___Wicket-user mailing list
Maybe we - core devs - should email about the major changes we are
doing in svn/ Wicket 2.0. It's all still very alpha though at this
stage.
Also, we could /consider/ putting those methods back in with final
(so your code will break) and a deprecation message? Or should we
just settle for
I'm not sure whether I get what you are after? Anyway, I think for most widgets, you typically want any images etc. to be created upfront (by a designer/ downloaded from somewhere). Good for preview-ability and possibly for scalability too.I would go for reusing some of the things the
Heh. Let's define 'problem' too. Many people are using Spring and Wicket together without any problems (and I'm being one of them)?Anyway, if it solves new problems, we're always happy to hear about new ideas/ get contributions.EelcoOn Jun 16, 2006, at 6:49 AM, Tom van Zummeren wrote:Hey, I
no it wont be the solution. havent you guys been following any of the other spring threads? injecting a component is not enough because you never want those dependencies serialized - thus the whole thing about wicket proxying the dependencies it injects.
you inject a service into a page's member
I saw the proposed solution. Thanks very much. I haven't had time
to try it out yet, but it sounds like it will work perfectly.
Thanks,
Michael Day
On Jun 16, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Davy De Durpel wrote:
I don't know if you still follow this thread. Maybe you're waiting
for an
alert.
well, mark stumbled on some major work-in-progress. johan and i are still trying out our new idea to see if it will work. looks like it will though :)just to quickly summarize some stuff for anyone interested
IModel.setObject(Component, Object) - IModel.setObject(Object)IModel.getObject(Component)
i am working on one to contribute...tryin to make it very simple..just DHTML container for Wicket Links..but getting well behaved CSS menus is night mare..i may be resorting for _javascript_ instead of CSS...i am signin up with
sf.net so that at least i can add some of these to wicket-stuff.its
Nice one! It is so fundamental and has always seemed odd to me. That interface almost put me off using Wicket when I first checked it out. I know that is a very superficial attitude, but first impressions are important. I think I may have even hit the back button and then returned for another
Look at WicketSessionFilter for an idea on how to do that.
Eelco
On 6/14/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, the session of each webapplication/servlet/whatever is stored under a
separate key in httpsession, so you should be able to retrieve it.
-Igor
On 6/14/06, Bruno
The funny thing is that IModel started out without that argument and that it only got in there after popular (use) demand and some heavy debate. But we feel more confident about the use cases where we need and don't need the component argument, and now Igor and Johan found some better ways to do
Thanks for sharing and congrats. Tiny remark: wouldn't you want to
work with bookmarkable pages more, especially for things like contact
details, terms of use, etc? You shouldn't really need to be in a
session to access those pages (you probably want google to index them)
and if you mount the urls
There was talk of someone having a go at a PetStore implementation,
but I don't recall hearing any more on that?
/Gwyn
On 16/06/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or even putting together a spec for an ideal example app would be great to
give us a good starting point.
-Igor
On
This could be the solution to all wicket-spring integration problems. Now for
someone to actually try it…May be I haven't been actively reading the list and missed some relevant posts. Has someone found a problem with current wicket-spring integration?.
no, there are no problems with wicket-spring poject other then some people dont think its a true way to integrate with spring. sigh.what the quote below shouldve read was
This could be the solution to all wicket - spring integration problems. Now for
someone to actually try it…-IgorOn 6/16/06,
Does Igor's post in the recent Adding javascript to Button.onclick
thread help?
/Gwyn
On 15/06/06, Yuri Magrisso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a page with behaviors that is easier for me to code directly in
JavaScript. I would like to render a page, let the user input data, then
send
I know :)
On 6/14/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but you dont need to use spring template to reap the benefits, and you damn
well know that since we dont :)
-Igor
On 6/14/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm familiar w/ Hibernate but unfortunately, know very
trollOn 6/14/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know :)On 6/14/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but you dont need to use spring template to reap the benefits, and you damn well know that since we dont :)
-Igor On 6/14/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm
in IE I am getting an error Object Expected when executing the autogenerated wicketSerialize( this ) in the generated ajax link. The behavior is bound to onKeyUp on an input text. Anyone else seen this error and know how to resolve it in IE?
Aaron
38 matches
Mail list logo
