we could make the namespace a setting.
Or maybe we could make all those statics a property...
johan
On 11/27/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the ideas behind IRequestCodingStrategy was to enable this.
Unfortunately, the default implementation of this,
When your application is set to production mode wicket tags will get
stripped leaving just plain html.
-js
On 11/27/06, Francisco Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I just wanted to know if it's indeed possible (and how) to change
wicket control generated words such as
:wicket:interface: ,
One of the ideas behind IRequestCodingStrategy was to enable this.
Unfortunately, the default implementation of this,
WebRequestCodingStrategy leaks implementation details with it's public
static strings. Surprise, surprise, these fields are used by other
classes, this it wouldn't be able to
Doh, I miss understood his question, dis-regard my previous reply.
-js
On 11/27/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the ideas behind IRequestCodingStrategy was to enable this.
Unfortunately, the default implementation of this,
WebRequestCodingStrategy leaks implementation
