I'm in favor of Session.get() returning null in 2.0, if not earlier.
You could add exists() in 1.3 and deprecate it in 2.0.
Gili
Frank Bille wrote:
> I guess it would be more like a Session.exists() :)
>
> +1 for that. it's backportable.
>
> Frank
>
>
> On 8/26/06, *Jaime De La Jara*
The not-throwing exception change could go into 1.3 IMO.
Martijn
On 8/26/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you are so humble, anyways just checked in exists() for app and session,
> seems requestcycle doesnt follow the same rules and will just return null -
> not something we should
you are so humble, anyways just checked in exists() for app and session, seems requestcycle doesnt follow the same rules and will just return null - not something we should tweak in 1.x stream because of silent failure.
-IgorOn 8/26/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I were the teach
If I were the teacher, my student passed me by far ;)
Eelco
On 8/26/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eelco wants company.
>
>
> On 8/26/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > remind me again why we let smartasses in?
> >
> >
> > -Igor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/25/06,
yes it is backportable (that method)but we can't kill the exception throwing in 1.2 that is not backportable.johanOn 8/26/06, Frank Bille
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess it would be more like a Session.exists() :)+1 for that. it's backportable.Frank
On 8/26/06, Jaime De La Jara <
[EMAIL PROTECT
Eelco wants company.On 8/26/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
remind me again why we let smartasses in?-IgorOn 8/25/06,
Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess it would be more like a Session.exists() :)+1 for that. it's backportable.
FrankOn 8/26/06, Jaime De La Jara <
[EMAIL
remind me again why we let smartasses in?-IgorOn 8/25/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess it would be more like a Session.exists() :)+1 for that. it's backportable.
FrankOn 8/26/06, Jaime De La Jara <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think Igor proposal, session.exists(), is correct and
I guess it would be more like a Session.exists() :)+1 for that. it's backportable.FrankOn 8/26/06, Jaime De La Jara <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I think Igor proposal, session.exists(), is correct and it could be added without
any impact.Jaime.>i think thats better then an npe, didnt even know we we
