Dear Pavel,
May I bring to your mind my problem?
Regards,
Oleg.
- Original Message -
From: Pavel Novak nov...@fzu.cz
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Wien] New qtl testing
Dear Oleg,
I am back in the Institute sifting slowly through the mails. I did not
forget, however.
Regards
Pavel
_
Dr. Pavel Novak
Department of Magnetism and Superconductivity
Institute of Physics AS CR
Cukrovarnicka 10, 162 53 Praha 6, Czech
Dear wien2k users,
I wonder if someone has used LDA+U in Wien2k with U added for s or p
orbitals? If yes, I would be grateful for any references and
suggestions.
Also, is it physically correct to apply LDA+U (SIC) method to s and p
orbitals, or it can be used with d or f only? How to define U and
We're using:
wien2k-08.2-20080407
built with:
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.2.3 (4.2.3-6mnb1)
GotoBLAS-1.26
and running on an 8 core (2 x quad core) Xeon machine.
Can wien2k take advantage of multithreading inherent to GotoBLAS
when either GOTO_NUM_THREADS or OMP_NUM_THREADS is set?
If so,
Dear Laurence
do you still know what were your settings when you were using openmpi? I
am still getting the same errors, maybe I am missing some of the flags or
something. I already recompile openmpi with gcc+ifort but it didn't work.
Thank you
Sergio Y. Rodriguez
Physics Department
Texas AM
Sorry, I've never used openmpi
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Sergio Yanuen Rodriguez
srodriguez at physics.tamu.edu wrote:
Dear Laurence
do you still know what were your settings when you were using openmpi? I
am still getting the same errors, maybe I am missing some of the flags or
6 matches
Mail list logo