[Wien] error in x lstart

2014-08-24 Thread Minghao Zhang
Hi all, *I encountered a problem while I run the initialization process for LiCoO2 structure through w2web.* *Here is my structure file:* LiCoO2 R LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 3166_R-3m MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang 5.310133 5.310133 26.550663 90.00 90.00120.00 ATOM -1:

Re: [Wien] error in x lstart

2014-08-24 Thread Laurence Marks
Your structure is wrong, the lattice constants are always in au. Hence your RMT's are anomalously small and everything has gone wrong;. On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Minghao Zhang miz...@eng.ucsd.edu wrote: Hi all, *I encountered a problem while I run the initialization process for

Re: [Wien] error in x lstart

2014-08-24 Thread Minghao Zhang
My structure unit is indeed au although it read in ang in the structure file. I think this is a common situation when we use the w2web interface to generate the struct.file. There has to be other problem. Check this link from wien2k site for the unit information:

Re: [Wien] error in x lstart

2014-08-24 Thread Laurence Marks
No, look at your RMT, they are a factor of two too small. On Aug 24, 2014 12:23 PM, Minghao Zhang miz...@eng.ucsd.edu wrote: My structure unit is indeed au although it read in ang in the structure file. I think this is a common situation when we use the w2web interface to generate the

Re: [Wien] about the rmt value

2014-08-24 Thread Laurence Marks
The first think to note is that emails should go to the list, not private email addresses (unless someone asks you to). The typical RMT via setrmt for Co is around 1.8, your value is too small. Use some viewer to look at the atom distances of your case.struct, e.g. Xcrygen, Vesta, Crystalmaker,

Re: [Wien] error in x lstart

2014-08-24 Thread Gavin Abo
Looks to me that your atomic positions are in the hexagonal setting, when they need to be in the rhombohedral setting [http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg05554.html] and your hexagonal lattice constants seem fine. On 8/24/2014 11:01 AM, Minghao Zhang wrote: Hi