Re: [Wien] Error during NMR calculations

2018-09-12 Thread sandeep Kumar
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha and Gavin Abo, Thanks for your response and suggestions! I will try to resolve it. By the way, I have tried NMR calculation on other material (containing 56 atoms) using same way and it works well for NMR calculations in parallel mode. Regards Sandeep On Tue, Sep 11,

Re: [Wien] The parameters to obtain an accurate small gap

2018-09-12 Thread Xavier Rocquefelte
Dear Xiangyan, 10 meV is more than very small! However, accuracy and parameters to adjust (or tune) will really depend on the material, the size of the unit cell, the nature of the bonding... If you want a more accurate answer, we need a more accurate question ;) Cheers Xavier Le

[Wien] The parameters to obtain an accurate small gap

2018-09-12 Thread 薄祥
Dear Dr. P. Blaha and Wien2k users, I am trying to calculate a material with a very small gap about 10 meV, and I want to get the value of the gap to be as accurate as possible. How should I do it? For example, what setting parameters should be set? I know I should use a large K-mesh and set

Re: [Wien] Error during NMR calculations

2018-09-12 Thread Peter Blaha
There is almost no information. From the dayfile I can see that the 3rd lapw1 is much shorter than the others: exciton10(1) 4.504u 15.270s 2:27.88 13.37% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w so I expect that this one crashes for what ever reasons (most likely, something like not enough memory, diskspace,

Re: [Wien] Error during NMR calculations

2018-09-12 Thread Gavin Abo
The output below looks like it is from a *.error and case.dayfile.  While that is partially informative, it seems insufficient.  So I doubt anybody can help you with the given information.  I suggest you look further for additional error messages. Usually such an error is accompanied with a