Re: [Wien] MMINT

2022-06-23 Thread Peter Blaha
As stated in the UG, for an integration of the spin.density in the atomic basins you should use: x aim -dn Of course, the inaim file must contain the integration directives. You do not need to run x aim and x aim -dn and take some difference. Justx aim -dn is enough. Whether the

Re: [Wien] MMINT

2022-06-23 Thread shahrbano rahimi
Dear Profs. Laurence Marks and Fabien Tran, Thank you so much for your prompt and complete reply. On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 8:12 AM wrote: > In https://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/publik_289949.pdf > we used the AIM method to calculate the magnetic moment and on page 9 we > wrote: > "The

Re: [Wien] MMINT

2022-06-23 Thread fabien . tran
In https://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/publik_289949.pdf we used the AIM method to calculate the magnetic moment and on page 9 we wrote: "The contribution from the interstitial region is one order of magnitude smaller and has opposite sign (negative), which is due to reverse polarization of the

Re: [Wien] MMINT

2022-06-23 Thread Laurence Marks
I do not think that there is a unique definition of interstitial magnetic moments for each atom -- in APW+lo methods the interstitial states extend over the whole cell. The best I can think of is to use the Bader charge, i.e. use "x aim" and "x aim -dn", take the difference (to spin resolve) then

[Wien] MMINT

2022-06-23 Thread shahrbano rahimi
Dear WIEN developers and users: Please let me know: How I can find the interstitial magnetic moment (MMINT) per atom in a ferromagnetic system with two kinds of magnetic atoms? What is the sign of interstitial magnetic moment (MMINT) per atom? Is it similar to the sign of the MMI of that atom?