ly waiting for your valuable suggestions!!
Thank you!!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lmvw5gHCu1toPvpE5jZC4lDNoCsANUaj/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/138U3dxXZaIKrkuB4xXvWQj5MmtT0ME6_/view?usp=sharing
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. S
I've shared an item with you:
AB0.75C0.25X3_YGZ.png
https://drive.google.com/file/d/138U3dxXZaIKrkuB4xXvWQj5MmtT0ME6_/view?usp=sharing=CJmtv74M=6197b459
It's not an attachment -- it's stored online. To open this item, just click
the link above.
I've shared an item with you:
AB0.75C0X3_GX.png
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lmvw5gHCu1toPvpE5jZC4lDNoCsANUaj/view?usp=sharing=CPu6nb4J=6197b434
It's not an attachment -- it's stored online. To open this item, just click
the link above.
___
, the BZ as
seen using xcrysden is not consistent with the BZ offered by the space
group (2-P-1) for the case 1). Is it okay to continue with the BZ found
using xcrysden?
Thank you!!!
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
Dear Prof. Gavin and Prof. Marks,
Thank you for clearing it to me. I have used the wrong formula (
http://webmineral.com/help/CellDimensions.shtml#.YXTy5SbhUlI) for the
volume of a triclinic cell and this made me confused.
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT
) to be "a=18.508,
b=39.835, c=40.199 Bohr; α=119.701◦, β=103.309◦, γ=90.0◦" and "24823.466
Bohr^3", respectively. I am confused about the initial volume which one I
should consider and why is this dissimiarity?
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of
. But I am
not able to find the suitable switch for the case b) in the optimize.job
script.
Your valuable suggestion is highly appreciated!!
Thank you!!
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha,
Thank you for your kind response!!
The system is orthorhombic in my case. May I follow the same procedure for
this also ?
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
and find out the optimized one?
Kindly help me to solve it!
Thank you in advance!!
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Thank you!!
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archiv
c/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IuOxHlNdrOaNXaVnoFz1RC1C5Z74U8Yv/view?usp=sharing
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.
the bandstructure, I have found that there is a overlapping
of different states and it looks very odd. Do I miss something or unfolding
of the bandstructure could be a solution?
Looking forward to hearing from you.
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
Dear Prof. Gavin,
Thank you for the information!!
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH
Thank you!!
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archiv
Dear Prof. Marks,
I have got a better view and thank you Prof. for the quick response!!
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http
th regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archiv
, 9.25) respectively. These much changes of
lattice parameter make me think twice.
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/m
alculation and want to confirm whether the structure is
okay or not before proceeding further. Kindly suggest me if I miss
something!!
Thank you!!
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@z
Thank you Prof. Blaha and Prof. Marks!!
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING
Dear experts and users,
I have attached the file for te bandstructure below.
Any suggestion is highly appreciated!!
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 at 13:45, Anupriya Nyayban wrote:
> Dear experts and users,
>
> I have attached the file for te bandstructure below.
>
> Any suggestion is hig
spaghetti -p -so
The steps from 2 to 10 are done from terminal and all steps are run without
error but the bandstructure looks weird. I am unable to find whats going
wrong.
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
).
Still, I am worried why the calculation has been stopped for my case only.
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 21:13, Anupriya Nyayban wrote:
> Dear Prof. Marks, Fecher and Gavin
>
> ,Thanks a lot for your valuable additional comments and help!!
>
> I have checked the dayfile and case.outp
, the struct file for +10 is attached below.
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 12:34, Anupriya Nyayban wrote:
> Dear Prof. Blaha,
>
>
> Thank you very much for the help!!
>
> First, I have activated both min and run_lapw in optimize.job to find the
> energy of the relaxed one, and could re
n have scf with the optimized lattice
parameters. converged RKmax and Kmesh?
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 17:42, Anupriya Nyayban wrote:
> Dear experts and users,
>
> In addition to the above information, I want to mention that commands used
> in optimize.job script are "min -I -j &q
w2". The scf calculations have been
> completed for the volume changes of -10, -5, 0, 5%.
>
> Looking forward for your suggestion.
> If you need any additional information please let me know.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> --
> With regards
> Anupriya Nyayban
> Ph.
.
Looking forward for your suggestion.
If you need any additional information please let me know.
Thank you in advance.
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.
as -2, -1, 1, 2, 3 (%) without the unstarined one
(i.e. 0%), then is there any change in the values of final elastic
coefficients after analysis?
Thank you in advance.
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of Physics
NIT Silchar
whether we are using the system maximally for the calculation or not. I am
using parallel calculation for the first time.
Looking forward to your valuable opinion.
Thank you in advance.
--
With regards
Anupriya Nyayban
Ph.D. Scholar
Department of
28 matches
Mail list logo