Thank you Prof. Blaha for your prompt response. I actually meant x lapwso
(and inadvertently typed palwso ).
with sincere regards
Susanta
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 9:42 PM Peter Blaha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess you mean lapwso when you typedpalwso.
>
>
> when you runx lapwso -hyou
Hi,
I guess you mean lapwso when you typed palwso.
when you run x lapwso -h you can see all possible allowed switches.
-dn is not allowed.
In a magnetic case lapwso couples (mixes) spin-up and dn, so both spins
are always considered.
A "better" switch would be -sp, just
Dear Prof Blaha and wien2k users.
I am facing a problem
while plotting dos with so. For up spin, all the commands are running but
for dn spin
x palwso -dn
I am getting an error like
ERROR IN OPENING UNIT: 18
FILENAME:
You need the qtl-Program for that. Read the UG.
(In the new version comming soon, a new QTL-Program
by P.Novak will be included which has a much more
userfriendly input).
John Appleton schrieb:
Dear users,
I wish to ask a question concerning the
density of states when SO is present.
As is
Dear users,
I wish to ask a question concerning the
density of states when SO is present.
As is known, SO no longer makes spin
a good quantum number yet WIEN2k allows
the spin-up and spin-dn DOS to be computed
when SO is present. In such a case how does
one interpret spin-up
5 matches
Mail list logo
