Dear Prof. P. Blaha and users,
Thank you very much for your reply.
The job failed in the 1st iteration itself. However, LAPW0 and LAPW1 ENDS
successfully for the 1st iteration. But the eigen values corresponds to
LAPW1 are not printed in case.scf1 using 12.1. But, When I stopped the
Definitely, without eigenvalues from lapw1, lapw2 must fail.
I can see that the MATRIX SIZE is different which could be due to different
sphere sizes
(which is possible, since setrmt has been changed). Please check.
Check also all case.output1 files for any possible message/difference.
Dear Prof. Blaha,
I have checked case.scf1 and case.output1 and observed that no eigen
values printed in case.scf1 after LAPW1 END and WARPING = NaN instead of a
finite value in case.output1, which leads to fail the job without
performing LAPW2 step in the first iteration. How to rectify this
The attached two patches were tested with a TiC calculation, and the
results were the same, but it was not tested thoroughly on other cases.
The previously reported error for a MBJ calculation also went away. If
you want to use the fftpack library instead of FFTW2 or 3, you can try
to use
Dear Prof. Blaha,
Thank you vey much your suggestions. We have used FFTW3 for fftwpack
library and the problem for NANs for the WARPING are solved. The
calculations are running fine.
Thanking you sir.
Regards
Yedukondalu
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was
Dear Prof. Stefaan Cottenier,*
*Thank you vey much for checking my input files. We have used FFTW3
for fftwpack library and the problem for NANs for the WARPING are solved. I
checked for TiC also all the calculations are running fine.
Thanking you sir.
Regards
Yedukondalu
Dear users and experts,
So far, we are doing calculations using WIEN2k 11.1 version and we
updated to the latest version of WIEN2k 12.1. Using 12.1 version, the
calculations are not terminated in the 1st iteration (we checked for few
compounds) by giving the following error. While the same
Could you post the case.struct, the details of the initialization and
your run_lapw command?
I would like to try to reproduce this, as we are facing a similar
problem with 12.1 in some large cells that are not so comfortable for
further testing (in our case, it happens only with FOR in
I'd expect something else went wrong. The error in line 518 in fermi.F is
atypical.
Are your input files ok ? Are your eigenvalues from lapw1 reasonable ?
Am 01.10.2012 15:43, schrieb yedu kondalu:
Dear users and experts,
So far, we are doing calculations using WIEN2k 11.1 version and we
9 matches
Mail list logo
