Re: [Wien] Fwd: Lapw2_1.def ERROR

2019-12-03 Thread Laurence Marks
Looking at your structure, you have four oxygens (O 17 to O21) which are not really bonded to anything. For instance, the closest atoms to O17 are K4 at 2.87 Angers and O4 at 2.84 Angers. The BVS [1] for these atoms are too small, 0.2-0.4. I strongly suspect that these are really water molecules

[Wien] Fwd: Lapw2_1.def ERROR

2019-12-02 Thread Ashwani Kumar
Thank you Dr. Marks for the comments. Case.struct file is attached. 1) With a largish unit cell like this you only need 1 k-point for optimization Noted. i will repeat calc. with 1 k-point for optimization. 2) An RKMAX of 3.5 is absurdly small. You probably misinterpreted the CIF file, which I

Re: [Wien] Fwd: Lapw2_1.def ERROR

2019-12-02 Thread Laurence Marks
You provide everything except the most relevant file -- case.struct Comments: 1) With a largish unit cell like this you only need 1 k-point for optimization 2) An RKMAX of 3.5 is absurdly small. You probably misinterpreted the CIF file, which I suspect contained partial occupancies. 3) It appears

[Wien] Fwd: Lapw2_1.def ERROR

2019-12-02 Thread Ashwani Kumar
Lapw2 error file generated with message "Error in Lapw2" only. Other *.error file (~lapw1_x.error) created empty. Case.dayfile is attached which shows last job id issued for 16 cores. You are right, Dr. Lyudmila. Warnings are present in case.dayfile related to inaccurate EF (appeared 16 times in