Re: [Wien] The new method of optimizing the internal parameter

2018-10-15 Thread Laurence Marks
The only difference is that with -min the run** code will switch from MSR1 to MSR1a, minimize, then switch back to MSR1 when the forces are small and fully converge the density. Depending on what (old ?) version of run** you are using it may not do this switching for you. The later run** also has

Re: [Wien] The new method of optimizing the internal parameter

2018-10-15 Thread karima Physique
Dear Prof. Laurence Marks Thank you very much for your answer *For the case of my calculations, I want to optimize the internal parameters of an atom of a **chalcopyrite**, **usually I used MSR1a without -min (old WIEN2k versions) :* *runsp -fc 1* *save xxx* *i change MSR1 to MSR1a * *runsp -fc

Re: [Wien] The new method of optimizing the internal parameter

2018-10-15 Thread Laurence Marks
There is in my opinion no "right" method. The question is what are you trying to do? Case 1: A structure with fixed positions or a problem where you "don't care" about minor forces, e.g. calculating a simple bulk structure. Then just "runsp -cc 0.0001 -ec 0.0001" is fine. (I prefer to use -cc as

[Wien] The new method of optimizing the internal parameter

2018-10-15 Thread karima Physique
Dear Wien2k user; According to user guide, after a SCF cycle with runsp -fc 1 we continue with run runsp -min I want to know which of these two methods is the correct one: 1) runsp -fc 1 runsp -min runsp -min -fc 0.5 -ec 0.0001 -cc 0.001 or 2) runsp -fc 1 runsp -min -fc 0.5 -ec 0.0001 -cc 0.001