Re: [Wien] X-FORCE for atom 1 is not zero as required by symmetry

2014-04-24 Thread foyevtsova
Dear Peter, with your recipe the problem is indeed fixed. It turns out after all that my in2 was wrong as a result of producing and running a series of struct files with varying degree of BiO6-octahedra tilting. I performed initialization for a structure with no tilting and then ran scf for a

Re: [Wien] X-FORCE for atom 1 is not zero as required by symmetry

2014-04-23 Thread Peter Blaha
You did not use the default initialization in wien2k, but probably a funny mixture of hand-made inputs, which are probably not consistent. i) sgroup would suggest a different cell with a large monoclinic angle. However, it seems as it is possible to neglect this suggestion. ii) symmetry

Re: [Wien] X-FORCE for atom 1 is not zero as required by symmetry

2014-04-23 Thread Fecher, Gerhard
Possible reasons: bug in some older version and/or a mistake made in one of the input files caused by a handbook not read error. Note: only the Bi atoms (atoms 2 and 3, but not 1, 4, 5, 6) are in positions without free parameters where the forces have to be zero by symmetry. Seems that in

Re: [Wien] X-FORCE for atom 1 is not zero as required by symmetry

2014-04-23 Thread Fecher, Gerhard
but still the line P6 4_P21/n is wrong either 14_P21/n (sgroup - 14 P21/c) or 4_P21, these two things are not the same ! Ciao Gerhard DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy: I think the problem, to be quite honest with you, is that you have never

Re: [Wien] X-FORCE for atom 1 is not zero as required by symmetry

2014-04-23 Thread foyevtsova
Dear Laurence, Peter and Gerhard, thanks for your comments. Some answers: 1) I am using version 13.1. Still, min_lapw has changed the space group number from 14 to 4, which I only noticed after Gerhard had pointed this out. The regular scf cycle was done with the correct space group in .struct

Re: [Wien] X-FORCE for atom 1 is not zero as required by symmetry

2014-04-23 Thread Peter Blaha
1) I am using version 13.1. Still, min_lapw has changed the space group number from 14 to 4, which I only noticed after Gerhard had pointed this out. The regular scf cycle was done with the correct space group in .struct and produced X-FORCE for atom 1 is not zero as required by symmetry. The

[Wien] X-FORCE for atom 1 is not zero as required by symmetry

2014-04-22 Thread foyevtsova
Hi, I want to calculate forces and eventually optimize internal parameters for SrBiO3 with a unit cell of the 4_P21/n space group. Below I copy the struct file: str P6 4_P21/n RELA 11.160207 11.599001 16.096181 90.00 90.00 90.00 ATOM -1:

Re: [Wien] X-FORCE for atom 1 is not zero as required by symmetry

2014-04-22 Thread Laurence Marks
Many things: 1. It appears that you did not adopt Wien2k's recommendation about reducing to the primitive cell -- why not? 2. Your RMT's look strange. You probably need to reduce the O a bit and increase the Bi. 3. Did you use the default case.in2? In a quick check this seems to have forces for