[Xavier.Rocquefelte at cnrs-imn.fr]
Gesendet: Samstag, 12. November 2011 15:06
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: Re: [Wien] reg: DOS at fermi level
Dear Swetarekha Ram,
You should take into account the interstitial region in such calculation. The
DOS in the interstitial region is a contribution
[swetarekharam at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. November 2011 13:34
An: wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Betreff: Re: [Wien] reg: DOS at fermi level
I have a small doubt on DOS at Fermi level. I want the value of N(E_F) for
my compound.
According to my idea, we will get this value form
It was my point in my first reply. You should consider the total DOS.
I don't know how many formula units (f.u.) are taken into account in
your structure file.
If you have only one formula unit, then the total DOS is given in
eV/States/f.u.
In contrast if the multiplicity in your structure file
] reg: DOS at fermi level
It was my point in my first reply. You should consider the total DOS.
I don't know how many formula units (f.u.) are taken into account in
your structure file.
If you have only one formula unit, then the total DOS is given in
eV/States/f.u.
In contrast if the multiplicity
. November 2011 15:03
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: Re: [Wien] reg: DOS at fermi level
It was my point in my first reply. You should consider the total DOS.
I don't know how many formula units (f.u.) are taken into account in
your structure file.
If you have only one formula unit
Dear Prof. Blaha and wien users
I have a small doubt on DOS at Fermi level. I want the value of N(E_F) for
my compound.
According to my idea, we will get this value form case.dos1ev file.
But the total DOS in this file is DOS due to the atoms and also due to
interstitial region.
So how can I
6 matches
Mail list logo