Sorry, the comment was confusing.
The spin moments specified in the initial configuration of course point
along the axis specified by the direction.
What I wanted to point out is that for symmetry reasons this is the only
meaningfull component you can specify. In this sense symmetry comes
Me a culpa, I should have checked the mailing list first for the answers.
That said, this issue has come up enough times in the past that I think the
UG should be tweaked so it is clearer. Let me try my interpretation, so I
can be shot down if needed.
Within Wien2k magnetic effects can be
I definitely am not an expert for -so, therefore I will not shoot down
anything, only a comment:
From my point of view from magnetism I would ask for some caution with
identifying the direction given in .inorb and .inso with 'the spin
direction'. As Gerhard pointed out earlier in this thread,
I would be interested in clarification from others, but from what I can see
in the code it appears that this is the spin direction that is used, not
just the direction of breaking the symmetry. I may be wrong.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:47 AM, pieper pie...@ifp.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
I definitely
Typo:
although I remember don't symmetry operations being split into these two
classes everywhere in the code
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Laurence Marks l-ma...@northwestern.edu
wrote:
I am a newbie at -so, so a few simple questions.
a) What is the meaning of the orbital moment in
5 matches
Mail list logo
