[Wien] minimization error

2014-01-30 Thread Saleem Ayaz
Dear users 
During minimization of forces for graphene structure I got the following error 
Please help me how to deal with this?

regards

Error in LAPW1
r in LAPW1
 Cholesky INFO =         1935
 'SECLR4' - POTRF (Scalapack/LAPACK) failed.

 Cholesky INFO =         1935
 'SECLR4' - POTRF (Scalapack/LAPACK) failed.___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Need your attention please

2014-01-30 Thread kalsoom Khan
Dear all
How can i get the equilibrium energies of the pure atomic components like 
Sc2CrZ compounds,  so how i can get for ESc, ECr and EZ.
with best regards
Kalsoom___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Need your attention please

2014-01-30 Thread kalsoom Khan
Dear all
I have problem in optimization, i want to optimize the the lattice constant.. 
but i have contrast in the reults. I did the optimization for two cubic 
compounds, in which for one compound the lattice constant increased from the 
experimental values. While for the other compound the lattice constant were 
decreased.
so please help me that which one is wrong. Either the optimized lattice 
constant increased or decreased.
with regards
kalsoom___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Need your attention please

2014-01-30 Thread Laurence Marks
There is nothing wrong so long as this is only a few percent although this
is a bit unusual. Normally PBE gives lattice constants too large, LDA too
small with PBEsol  WC closer to experiment. I myself do not consider
agreement between expt  calculated lattice constants (within a few
percent) to be a very useful test of functionals despite what is in the
literature.

__
Laurence Marks
Dept Mat Sci  Eng
Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu
847 491 3996
On Jan 30, 2014 8:13 AM, kalsoom Khan kkkhan.qu...@yahoo.com wrote:

  Dear all
 I have problem in optimization, i want to optimize the the lattice
 constant.. but i have contrast in the reults. I did the optimization for
 two cubic compounds, in which for one compound the lattice constant
 increased from the experimental values. While for the other compound the
 lattice constant were decreased.
 so please help me that which one is wrong. Either the optimized lattice
 constant increased or decreased.
 with regards
 kalsoom

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Need your attention please

2014-01-30 Thread kalsoom Khan
Thank sir Laurence Marks
For your kind reply.
with best regards
kalsoom 



On Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:38 PM, Laurence Marks 
l-ma...@northwestern.edu wrote:
 
There is nothing wrong so long as this is only a few percent although this is a 
bit unusual. Normally PBE gives lattice constants too large, LDA too small with 
PBEsol  WC closer to experiment. I myself do not consider agreement between 
expt  calculated lattice constants (within a few percent) to be a very useful 
test of functionals despite what is in the literature.
__
Laurence Marks
Dept Mat Sci  Eng
Northwestern University
www.numis.northwestern.edu
847 491 3996
On Jan 30, 2014 8:13 AM, kalsoom Khan kkkhan.qu...@yahoo.com wrote:

Dear all
I have problem in optimization, i want to optimize the the lattice constant.. 
but i have contrast in the reults. I did the optimization for two cubic 
compounds, in which for one compound the lattice constant increased from the 
experimental values. While for the other compound the lattice constant were 
decreased.
so please help me that which one is wrong. Either the optimized lattice 
constant increased or decreased.
with regards
kalsoom
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] wyckoff positions

2014-01-30 Thread Junaid Munir
Dear Expert Users,


I am trying to generate a structure of the compound A(B4C4D2)X4Y10 with space 
group 63 cmcm using wien2k. 
here A(B4C4D2) is cation and X4Y10 is an anion. I have some questions as 
follows,

Kindly guide me how can I make its structure file ?
For example if want to make structure file of spinel ZnAl2O4. we just have to 
select 3 atoms and their poisitions are as fallow 
Zn       0.125, 0.125, 0.125
Al 0.5, 0.5, 0.5
O 0.25,0.25, 0.25 (Ideally)
Similarly, please indicate How many number of atoms have to select for  
A(B4C4D2)X4Y10 and what are their respective positions ?

Regards,
Junaid___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html