Re: [Wien] Calculation about the effect of external magnetic field

2014-09-02 Thread Fecher, Gerhard
How strong was the field ?
If you have a magnetic material saturated (say Fe at about 2.2. mu_B, I guess 
that's what you have already without magnetic field), 
what changes do you expect when you apply a magnetic field on top of the 
saturation ?

Application of a magnetic field in the calculation may stabilyse a otherwise 
metastable magnetic solution.

Ciao
Gerhard

DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is.


Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
Johannes Gutenberg - University
55099 Mainz

Von: wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at 
[wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at]quot; im Auftrag von quot;李艳丽 
[liyanli...@163.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2014 06:19
An: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Betreff: [Wien] Calculation about the effect of external magnetic field

Dear all,
I notice that a external magnetic field could be applied in wien2k by orb. 
And I used the order ' runsp_lapw -ec 0.0001 -orb -p ' to calculate the effect 
of external magnetic field on the electronic structures of Fe3O4, and there are 
no change happened.
   I also tried many tests on other materials, and the results are also the 
same with that without the external magnetic field. So it means the external 
magnetic field has no effect on the properties of the materials, which is not 
consistent with the experimental results.
  Therefore I want to know  whether the function of adding external magnetic 
field worked ?
Best Regards,
Yanli
Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, P.R.China
430070


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] mBJ usability and relevance for semiconductor/metal heterostructures?

2014-09-02 Thread Martin Gmitra
Dear Wien2k users,

I would like to ask you to share your opinion about relevance of mBJ
potential used in study of semiconductor/metal heterostructures. The
question would be -- How should be fixed value of the c parameter?

In case of a supercell (.../SC/M/...) approach (no vacuum) should one
consider a bulk semiconductor value for the c?

What consider for the c in case of a slab ( .../SC/M/vacuum/...)?

Best regards,
Martin Gmitra
Uni Regensburg
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] mBJ usability and relevance for semiconductor/metal heterostructures?

2014-09-02 Thread tran

Hi,

Most likely the semiconductor and metal will require different
values of c. Furthermore, mBJ is maybe not the best choice for metals,
and for Fe, Co, Ni a value of c smaller than 1 is more appropriate for the
magnetic moment [Koller et al., PRB 83, 195134 (2011)].

It's not easy to say in advance which c is the most appropriate for
such heterostructures. Maybe tunning c until an experimental value
is reproduced.

For sure the vacuum should not be used to fix x.

F. Tran

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Martin Gmitra wrote:


Dear Wien2k users,

I would like to ask you to share your opinion about relevance of mBJ
potential used in study of semiconductor/metal heterostructures. The
question would be -- How should be fixed value of the c parameter?

In case of a supercell (.../SC/M/...) approach (no vacuum) should one
consider a bulk semiconductor value for the c?

What consider for the c in case of a slab ( .../SC/M/vacuum/...)?

Best regards,
Martin Gmitra
Uni Regensburg
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Hard charge convergence

2014-09-02 Thread Luis Ogando
Dear Wien2k community,

   I would like some general hints for a system with a difficult charge
convergence.
   In my case, I got the energy convergence (-ec 0.0001), but not the
charge one (-cc 0.0001).
   Would it be acceptable to increase the charge convergence criterion to
-cc 0.0005 ? I am getting charge changes bellow this value.
   All the best,
Luis
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Hard charge convergence

2014-09-02 Thread tran

Hi,

It depends on your needs. Just use the command grep to see
if the quantity you are interested in particular (e.g., magnetic moment
or band gap) seems to have reached a degree of convergence
which satisfies you.

F. Tran

On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Luis Ogando wrote:


Dear Wien2k community,

   I would like some general hints for a system with a difficult charge 
convergence.
   In my case, I got the energy convergence (-ec 0.0001), but not the charge 
one (-cc 0.0001).
   Would it be acceptable to increase the charge convergence criterion to -cc 
0.0005 ? I am getting charge changes bellow this value.
   All the best,
    Luis

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Hard charge convergence

2014-09-02 Thread Luis Ogando
Dear Professor Tran,

   Thank you for your response.
   Actually, I am doing structure optimization, so energy is the most
important parameter (and forces due to free parameters). Perhaps, I am
being too strict when asking for charge convergence during structure
optimization. What is your opinion ?
   Thank you again.
   All the best,
 Luis


2014-09-02 16:59 GMT-03:00 t...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at:

 Hi,

 It depends on your needs. Just use the command grep to see
 if the quantity you are interested in particular (e.g., magnetic moment
 or band gap) seems to have reached a degree of convergence
 which satisfies you.

 F. Tran


 On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Luis Ogando wrote:

  Dear Wien2k community,

I would like some general hints for a system with a difficult charge
 convergence.
In my case, I got the energy convergence (-ec 0.0001), but not the
 charge one (-cc 0.0001).
Would it be acceptable to increase the charge convergence criterion to
 -cc 0.0005 ? I am getting charge changes bellow this value.
All the best,
 Luis


 ___
 Wien mailing list
 Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
 http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
 SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Hard charge convergence

2014-09-02 Thread tran

What is important for geometry optimization is to require also force
convergence (-fc) with a value like 0.5 or 1 (see user's guide).


On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Luis Ogando wrote:


Dear Professor Tran,

   Thank you for your response.
   Actually, I am doing structure optimization, so energy is the most
important parameter (and forces due to free parameters). Perhaps, I am being
too strict when asking for charge convergence during structure optimization.
What is your opinion ?
   Thank you again.
   All the best,
 Luis


2014-09-02 16:59 GMT-03:00 t...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at:
  Hi,

  It depends on your needs. Just use the command grep to see
  if the quantity you are interested in particular (e.g., magnetic
  moment
  or band gap) seems to have reached a degree of convergence
  which satisfies you.

  F. Tran

  On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Luis Ogando wrote:

Dear Wien2k community,

   I would like some general hints for a system with
a difficult charge convergence.
   In my case, I got the energy convergence (-ec
0.0001), but not the charge one (-cc 0.0001).
   Would it be acceptable to increase the charge
convergence criterion to -cc 0.0005 ? I am getting
charge changes bellow this value.
   All the best,
    Luis


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html



___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html