: not available
URL:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20101214/08f05075/attachment.png
You did not mention what your RKmax value is. This is more
important than the RMTs.
Of course, by changing RMTs for Mn you also change the effective RKmax
for Pt.
In general smaller RMTs (down to 2.0 for Mn) yield
more accurate results, provided that you are converged with the
number of PWs
Dear prof. Blaha,
Thank you for your reply. My RKmax is 8.8.
Tomas Kana
You did not mention what your RKmax value is. This is more
important than the RMTs.
Of course, by changing RMTs for Mn you also change the effective RKmax
for Pt.
In general smaller RMTs (down to 2.0 for Mn) yield
more
Dear Wien2K users,
I am trying to relax GaAs surface with pair of nitrogen impurities.
For that I construct the supercell with 96 atoms ( Spacegroup: 6_Pm. No
inversion symmetry).
In total I have 12 layers with 8 atoms in each.
First (bottom) layer consists of hydrogen atoms (for passivation).
So many things!
1. With your RMT's a RKMAX of 5 should be fine. Personaly I do not
believe in using H termination, I consider it flakey. I suspect that
your H RMT is too large.
2. Use a k-mesh which gives you the same density in reciprocal space
as you need for an adequate bulk calculation --
5 matches
Mail list logo