Re: [Wien] f orbital under an external magnetic field

2015-08-06 Thread pieper
Dear Bin Shao, unfortunately I am travelling and won't be able to contribute during the next days. I am looking forward to comments from people with experience in calculations with rare earths. May I just ask why you go for the energy and not for the magnetization or the susceptibility? If

Re: [Wien] structure-optimization

2015-08-06 Thread Seyyed Amir Abbas Emami
​Thank you dear Luarence I run the volume optimization with that script but there is two question? 1- Did the lattice obtain from equation of state, optimized with both degree of freedoms (lattice parameter and atomic position) ? 2-How can i find the optimized atomic position from the results?

Re: [Wien] f orbital under an external magnetic field

2015-08-06 Thread Bin Shao
Dear Martin Pieper, Thank you for your reply. Actually, the energy difference can be observed by the photoluminescence experiment. I want to make a demonstration for the experiment from first-principles calculation. May I just ask why you go for the energy and not for the magnetization or the

[Wien] 100+ atomic numbers

2015-08-06 Thread foyevtsova
Dear wien2k community, is it possible to do a calculation for an element with the atomic number greater than 100? I am getting an error when the struct file is read. Thank you, Kateryna Foyevtsova ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at

Re: [Wien] 100+ atomic numbers

2015-08-06 Thread Gavin Abo
It might help if you mention specifically which atomic number you are try to use. Also, the error occurs when the struct file is read by what (StructGen, lapw0, ...)? What is the exact error message given by the program? You can specify elements to atomic number 103 in StructGen. If you

Re: [Wien] structure-optimization

2015-08-06 Thread Seyyed Amir Abbas Emami
​thank you very much But actually i was wondering can i use this script in volume optimization (optimize.job) to satisfy both force and charge convergence to obtain both optimized lattice parameters and atomic position of one with free internal parameters: min -j -I runsp_lapw -I -fc 1.0 -i

Re: [Wien] structure-optimization

2015-08-06 Thread Laurence Marks
I see no reason why not. BUT, I strongly suggest that you do not use -in1new -min at the same time. The -in1new option creates problems for MSR1a according to tests that I did some time ago. Also, -cc 0.0001 is a very high convergence leve, I would use something more like -cc 0.0005 or -cc

Re: [Wien] f orbital under an external magnetic field

2015-08-06 Thread Bin Shao
Dear Martin Pieper, Thank you for your comments! Actually, I intend to demonstrate that the energy difference between the ground state of Er^3+ (S=3/2; L=6; J=15/2) and the excited state (S=3/2; L=0; J=3/2) can be tuned by the external magnetic field, With the magnetic filed and the crystal