You need -orb with lapw1:
x lapw1 -up -orb -p
x lapw1 -dn -orb -p
such that the orbital potential is also included in the Hamiltonian.
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Paresh Chandra Rout wrote:
Thank you sir for the reply. I had run PDOS calculation followed by a GGA+U
calculation similar way what I
Thank you sir for the reply. I had run PDOS calculation followed by a GGA+U
calculation similar way what I had done for GGA . The PDOS for GGA are
well matching with the pwscf PDOS. But GGA+U PDOS generated in w2k
looking strange .
Here I am providing the command prompts for GGA+U PDOS
Nobody can help you with this information.
You have to tell us exactly what you have done. List explicitly the
commands you have used to get the DOS.
Am 25.02.2016 um 06:30 schrieb Paresh Chandra Rout:
Dear all,
I am facing a problem in GGA+U calculation as I am using it for the
first time
Dear all,
I am facing a problem in GGA+U calculation as I am using it for the first
time in w2k . The GGA+U DOS results are seems strange . The results are
quite different from the PWSCF DOS while the GGA results are very similar
in both PWSCF and W2K calculation. I am not sure whether
I have
Hi Peram,
The WIEN2k mailing list is not the appropriate venue to discuss
compilation problems in critic2. Please, contact me using this e-mail
address.
Best,
Alberto
* Peram sreenivasa reddy [2016-02-25 09:46:04 +0530]:
> Dear wien2k,
>
> I facing some problem
Dear wien2k,
I facing some problem while the installation of criti2 program. I
downloaded the program form
https://github.com/aoterodelaroza/critic2
At the time of installation i am facing error as given bellow. Any body
have experience with these type of errors.
ifort
Dear Victor,
Thank you very much for your replay.
I will try the new version as suggested by you. And get beck to you with
the results.
Thanking you ...
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Víctor Luaña <
vic...@fluor.quimica.uniovi.es> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:28:52AM +0530,
Yes, I intentionally put the U=0 to print the occupations .
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Elias Assmann
wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 02:58 PM, Paresh Chandra Rout wrote:
> > I have done it correctly or not. Any help would be highly
> > appreciated . Here I am attaching the
On 02/24/2016 02:58 PM, Paresh Chandra Rout wrote:
> I have done it correctly or not. Any help would be highly
> appreciated . Here I am attaching the following files case.inorb,
> case.indm,case.outputorbup,case.outputorbdn.
You explicitly put a U of 0 on atoms 6 and 7. Is that intentional?
9 matches
Mail list logo