I would try all procedures (so then orb, orb then so,
and so and orb at the same time) to see what comes out:
different solutions are obtained or always the same is obtained?
For f-systems in particular, there may be several local minima
that can be stabilized and usually one choose the one with t
Why not running both at the same time (runsp_lapw -so -orb)? Is there any
problem about it?
Karel
--- x ---
dr. Karel Vyborny
Fyzikalni ustav AV CR, v.v.i.
Cukrovarnicka 10
Praha 6, CZ-16253
tel: +420220318459
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, Xavier Rocquefelte wrote:
Dear Sylwia
I will give you a
Dear Sylwia
I will give you a chemist answer, which appears to work properly in many
cases.
If you have 3d elements, the crystal field (CF) is usually larger than
SOC, thus I will do first orb, and then include SO.
If you have 4f elements, the SOC is usually larger than the CF, thus I
will
Dear Mr Blaha and others,
my question seems to be trivial and I am sorry about that, but I cannot find
clear answer:
what should we do first: calculations with SOC (without orb) and then include
orb or calculations with orb (without SOC) and then include SOC?
Best regards,
Sylwia
_
4 matches
Mail list logo