Dear Gavin,
Sorry my question was probably to short, it should read
Does anyone know whether "== " works with gfortran ?
With ifort the following test works well, but I cannot test it with gfortran
The answer in the Intel forum that you quote does not include "=="
program logicaltest
The == should work for C/C++ language. I don't recall ever seeing that
being used for Fortran.
A quote from a HP Doctor Fortran article [
https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-visual-fortran-compiler-for-windows/topic/274462
]:
"The real trouble with making assumptions about the
Thank you.
LAPW1 seem to work with default 4 threads.
Now run_lapw stops at the next step:
STOP LAPW0 END
STOP LAPW1 END
STOP LAPW2 - Error. Check file lapw2.error
$ cat lapw2.error
'LAPW2' - can't open unit: 15
'LAPW2' - filename: GaAs.tmp
'LAPW2' - status: scratch form: unformatted In the
Does == work ?
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut of Inorganic and Analytical
See below
On 6/25/19 5:47 AM, Peter Blaha wrote:
Hi,
I can confirm the fix for inputpars.F. Of course, according to
fortran standards a logical if should have an .eqv. operator (although
I never "understood" what that should be good for ...).
Keeps computer scientists occupied
Hi,
I can confirm the fix for inputpars.F. Of course, according to
fortran standards a logical if should have an .eqv. operator (although I
never "understood" what that should be good for ...).
Also your second problem I have most likely recently seen myself. I
guess it happens only
6 matches
Mail list logo
