Re: [Wien] berrypi missing -c case (in automatic)

2016-03-11 Thread Laurence Marks
You are right, I missed that. --- Professor Laurence Marks "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi http://www.numis.northwestern.edu Corrosion in 4D http://MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu Partner of the CFW 100% gender equity

Re: [Wien] berrypi missing -c case (in automatic)

2016-03-11 Thread Oleg Rubel
The necessity for the ‘-c’ option is not obvious. Would you please give a hint? BerryPI executes ‘x lapw1’ and then ‘x w2w’. I both cases, ‘x’ script is used that identifies complex calculation. There is no need to be more specific and call for ‘x lapw1 -c’ or ‘x w2w -c’ (please correct me, if

[Wien] berrypi missing -c case (in automatic)

2016-03-11 Thread Laurence Marks
berrypi seems to need a "-c" option for the complex case, presumably can be hacked around. Similarly needed for the call of w2w that it makes (I think). -- Professor Laurence Marks "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi