Re: [Wien] Different Plasma Frequency (PF) for bulk and supercell Na

2015-10-13 Thread Dr. K. C. Bhamu
Dear sajjad I am also a beginner but I must suggest you to choose 18*18*3 k points for 1*1*6 supercell in comparison with bulk. As volume in real space is inversely proportional to volume of reciprocal space. Larger the volume in real space lower the volume in reciprocal space. So while computing

Re: [Wien] Different Plasma Frequency (PF) for bulk and supercell Na

2015-10-13 Thread Lyudmila Dobysheva
13.10.2015 09:42, Muhammad Sajjad wrote: I have computed PF for bulk Na and its value is *5.943 eV* with k-mesh *18*18*18*. Then I constructed a supercell 1*1*6: *K-meshPF (x/z components in eV)* *24*24*24 5.7097 / 5.8192* *36*36*24

Re: [Wien] Different Plasma Frequency (PF) for bulk and supercell Na

2015-10-13 Thread Lyudmila Dobysheva
13.10.2015 12:58, Muhammad Sajjad wrote: Should plasma frequency be same for bulk and supercell? I do not know about PF, but I'd say yes. In terms of accuracy, this is the worst. but why? Because 30 in z direction in supercell means 180 in usual cell, and you have only 18. Lyudmila

Re: [Wien] Different Plasma Frequency (PF) for bulk and supercell Na

2015-10-13 Thread Muhammad Sajjad
Dear Lyudmila and BHamu Thank you for your suggestions. I have already used 18*18*3 for supercell and 18*18*18, but found difference in plasma frequency for supercell and bulk. Should plasma frequency be same for bulk and supercell? or I should use the new plasma frequency obtained from super