Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-27 Thread Peter Blaha
Thanks for the report. Not the most elegant fix, but most simple: Replace set atoms=`grep RMT $file.struct|cut -c1-5` by set atoms=`grep RMT $file.struct|cut -c1-5|cut -f1 -d' '` This way you "loose" the info "O 1", instead only O is printed. Am 27.04.2020 um 18:14 schrieb Luc Fruchter:

Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-27 Thread Luc Fruchter
Sorry to be back with this again, but it seems that lines for the corrected init_orb_lapw script: set atoms=`grep RMT $file.struct|cut -c1-5` set nat=$#atoms will count two atoms instead of one, each time the atom symbol is only one character long (because of space between atom and

Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-26 Thread Gavin Abo
To add a little to what Prof. Marks has said: The -NI tells the WIEN2k program to continue an scf calculation with existing broyd files. Perhaps, you have read the following post about save_lapw removing the broyd files:

Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-26 Thread Laurence Marks
Definitely not. The -NI tells the mixer it can continue the same problem. However, when you add -orb, -so you have changed your problem. This is different from running init_lapw again, which you don't want to do -- you are using the converged density from one phase as input to the next. _

Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-26 Thread Luc Fruchter
# remember: the recommendation is to do this in steps in order to get # more likely the groundstate for correlated compounds and usually you # also want to see anyway what is the effect of SO and of U as compared # to a plain PBE calculation runsp_lapw (-p) save_lapw PBE_no_so runsp_lapw -so (-p)

Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-24 Thread Peter Blaha
Just beware of the typos in this summary. Don't use copy/paste (and neglect the corresponding error messages). See also my comments and recommendations. I also include an updated init_orb_lapw, which fixes the bug for MULT>1, so that editing of indm and inorb files is no longer necessary.

Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-23 Thread Tran, Fabien
calls lapw0, lapw1, lapw2, lapwso, etc. From: Wien on behalf of Luc Fruchter Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 7:31 PM To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at Subject: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO Thanks for your very kind help

[Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-23 Thread Luc Fruchter
Thanks for your very kind help: the whole process runs with no error error now. (I am still puzzled what the -orb and -so options in lapw1 are for: in my mind, this should have called the lapwso -orb extra process that you pointed). I summarize correct steps for future readers: initialize

Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-23 Thread Fecher, Gerhard
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von Luc Fruchter [luc.fruch...@u-psud.fr] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. April 2020 16:24 An: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at Betreff: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO >When SO is activated, this is lapws

[Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-23 Thread Luc Fruchter
When SO is activated, this is lapwso (and not lapw1) which adds the U-potential to the Hamiltonian matrix (have a look at the file :log). Thanks for rectifying (you probably mean 'adds SO'). I should have written for the actual scheme "lapw1 -up -band -orb -so" which may be, from U.G. program

Re: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-23 Thread Tran, Fabien
of Luc Fruchter Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020 3:28 PM To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at Subject: [Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO Dear all, I have been trying to perform U+SO comptations on Sr2RhO4 to get a bandstructure. My scheme is the following: Initialize

[Wien] case.in1c missing for a centrosymmetric case doing U+SO

2020-04-23 Thread Luc Fruchter
Dear all, I have been trying to perform U+SO comptations on Sr2RhO4 to get a bandstructure. My scheme is the following: Initialize spin-polarized case init_orb_lapw -orb init_so_lapw runsp_lapw -orb -so define case.klist_band lapw1 -up -band -orb lapw1 -dn -band -orb put Fermi energy in