Re: [Wien] init_lapw -nodstart and mBJ

2023-10-25 Thread Mikhail Nestoklon via Wien
Than you for the clarification!   I was checking the new options of init_lapw and was confused by the following  phrase in UG [page 73]: > Once you have a scf solution (and have ”saved” the results), you can rerun > init lapw with higher > precision and the -nodstart switch, to create a more

Re: [Wien] init_lapw -nodstart and mBJ

2023-10-25 Thread Peter Blaha
This is the expected behaviour. Why would you run   init_lapw ... -nodstart again ? It rewrites ALL  input files (except the density of the last scf cycle). Thus your mBJ setting are overwritten and you do another PBE calculation. In essence, you have to run again   init_mbj   after

[Wien] init_lapw -nodstart and mBJ

2023-10-25 Thread Mikhail Nestoklon via Wien
Dear wien2k community, I encountered strange and unexpected problem. If I try to use init_lapw -nodstart with mBJ calculations, the results are quite strange. On bilk Si, init_lapw -prec 1n and converge mBJ in Koller paramerization, the gap is 1.151 eV. Next, init_lapw -prec 2n -nokshift