Re: [Wien] possible bugs in kgen after SOC

2013-08-16 Thread tran
The k-points in case.klist and the G-vectors in, e.g., case.clmsum are expressed the same way (cubic). I think that there is no transformation from cubic to primitive before doing calculations in the code. F. Tran On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Guo-ping Zhang wrote: Thank you so much, Dr. Tran! Yes, my

Re: [Wien] possible bugs in kgen after SOC

2013-08-16 Thread Guo-ping Zhang
Thank you so much, Dr. Tran! Yes, my test case is fcc. I also verified that this does not happen for orthorhombic structures. However, do you know whether the wien code internally uses the cubic lattice vectors instead of primitive lattice vectors? It worries me since the klist's division

Re: [Wien] possible bugs in kgen after SOC

2013-08-16 Thread tran
If your solid has a bcc or fcc unit cell, then it is normal, since the k points are expressed in terms of the cubic lattice vectors which are not the primitive ones. F. Tran On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Guo-ping Zhang wrote: Dear Peter and wien users, I got a very strange list of k point with kgen a

[Wien] possible bugs in kgen after SOC

2013-08-15 Thread Guo-ping Zhang
Dear Peter and wien users, I got a very strange list of k point with kgen after initso (with noaxial magnetization say, along (1,1,1) direction. Here is an example. My initization was done as usual (without using 0 division) and I also made true three divs are exactly same. |