with the new structure obtained from
sgroup for initialize calculations and construct a new struct file?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100224/84d6ba13/attachment.htm
.
Thanks in advance.
regards,
Shamik Chakrabarti
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100224/768d5d5f/attachment.htm
Unless something has changed, forces are not implemented for
spin-orbit correctly so you cannot do a force minimization with them
(unless you do some tricks, i.e. minimize the enegy by hand not using
the code).
For spin/U the question is how large a difference does this make to
the electron
:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20100224/8c7beb20/attachment.htm
No, you cannot compare energies with/without spin-orbit, they are
different physics. You could optimize the volume after adding it in
(not internal co-ordinates) and this would be reasonable to do.
2010/2/24 shamik chakrabarti shamikphy at gmail.com:
Dear?Laurence Marks Sir,
?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Dear Wien2k users and developers,
I'd like to refresh the discussion about the total energies of the
charged cells which took place three years ago:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/2007-January/008711.html
I'm trying to calculate the formation energy of the Hydrogen vacancy
in
Please see the next email on the list:
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/2007-January/008713.html
I think this is right and you take V0 from case.output0 (it is printed
there). You should do an empty cell test (no electrons) to verify this
and the units of V0, perhaps also looking
Sorry, I am not an expert on Fe although I think you only want
spin-orbit for heavy atoms.
2010/2/24 shamik chakrabarti shamikphy at gmail.com:
Dear Laurence Marks Sir,
?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? We are doing calculation on a system
which has Fe atom as the most atomic numbered atom.
I've started some tests after the first query and it seems we might miss a term
in the total
energy.
I created a clmsum-file (density) which is constant and is normalized to one
and put this into
a cell with a single H nucleus.
So it refers to the test case of a H+ ion in a lattice, where I do
Dear Laurence and All,
Thank you very much for the information. It has been very helpful in clarifying
some of the issues. Based on your input, I was able to prepare the .machines in
the correct format, I believe:
.machines:
#
lapw0: nx59:2 nx58:2
1:nx59
1:nx59
1:nx58
1:nx58
granularity:1
10 matches
Mail list logo