Re: [Wien] PBESol is not generating atomic configuration for Li
Thanks Dr. Tran Regards Bhamu On Sat, May 18, 2019, 2:11 PM wrote: > Hi, > > I can reproduce this problem for LiH, which strangely occurs > only with PBESOl. We will look into this problem. Meanwhile, > do init_lapw with PBE and then replace XC_PBE by XC_PBESOL > in case.in0 before run_lapw. > > F. Tran > > On Saturday 2019-05-18 10:12, Dr. K. C. Bhamu wrote: > > >Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 10:12:58 > >From: Dr. K. C. Bhamu > >Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users < > wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> > >To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users > >Subject: [Wien] PBESol is not generating atomic configuration for Li > > > >Dear Wien2k users, > > > >I am initializing a case containing Li and H. > >The initialization and scf goes well for GGA/LDA/PBE but for PBESol I am > not getting any atomic configuration and it is empty on terminal. > >The error is > >Atomic configuration for atom: Li2 Z= 3.00 > > >>> nothing is written here!! while in case of other > approaches atomic configuration is written for 1s and 2s states > > > >ERROR !!! nstop,iter,tets,test 362 4 9.99974752427E-007 > >You have to change your atomic configuration in pbe.inst > > atom 1 has a large sphere , consider setting HDLOs and/or larger LVNS > > atom 2 has a large sphere , consider setting HDLOs and/or larger LVNS > >> inputfiles prepared(13:39:37) > > inputfiles prepared > > next is kgen > > NUMBER OF K-POINTS IN WHOLE CELL: (0 allows to specify 3 divisions of G) > > length of reciprocal lattice vectors: 0.827 0.827 0.827 10.000 > 10.000 10.000 > > Shift of k-mesh allowed. Do you want to shift: (0=no, 1=shift) > > 35 k-points generated, ndiv= 10 10 > 10 > >KGEN ENDS > > next is dstart > >> dstart -p(13:39:37) running dstart in single mode > >forrtl: severe (24): end-of-file during read, unit 81, file > /home/kcbhamu/pbe/pbe.rsp > >Image PCRoutineLine > Source > >dstart 004232C7 Unknown Unknown > Unknown > >dstart 00444603 Unknown Unknown > Unknown > >dstart 0040B1EB init_ 158 init.F > >dstart 004096CB MAIN__ 19 > dstart.F > >dstart 00402FDE Unknown Unknown > Unknown > >libc.so.6 1510F641CB97 Unknown Unknown > Unknown > >dstart 00402EEA Unknown Unknown > Unknown > >0.0u 0.0s 0:00.06 16.6% 0+0k 96+24io 0pf+0w > >error: command /home/kcbhamu/soft/WIEN2k_18.2/dstartpara dstart.def > failed > > n stop error n > > > > > >Any hint or help will be appreciated. > > > > > >regards > >Bhamu > > > > > >___ > Wien mailing list > Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien > SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html > ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
Re: [Wien] PBESol is not generating atomic configuration for Li
Hi, I can reproduce this problem for LiH, which strangely occurs only with PBESOl. We will look into this problem. Meanwhile, do init_lapw with PBE and then replace XC_PBE by XC_PBESOL in case.in0 before run_lapw. F. Tran On Saturday 2019-05-18 10:12, Dr. K. C. Bhamu wrote: Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 10:12:58 From: Dr. K. C. Bhamu Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users Subject: [Wien] PBESol is not generating atomic configuration for Li Dear Wien2k users, I am initializing a case containing Li and H. The initialization and scf goes well for GGA/LDA/PBE but for PBESol I am not getting any atomic configuration and it is empty on terminal. The error is Atomic configuration for atom: Li2 Z= 3.00 >>> nothing is written here!! while in case of other approaches atomic configuration is written for 1s and 2s states ERROR !!! nstop,iter,tets,test 362 4 9.99974752427E-007 You have to change your atomic configuration in pbe.inst atom 1 has a large sphere , consider setting HDLOs and/or larger LVNS atom 2 has a large sphere , consider setting HDLOs and/or larger LVNS inputfiles prepared (13:39:37) inputfiles prepared next is kgen NUMBER OF K-POINTS IN WHOLE CELL: (0 allows to specify 3 divisions of G) length of reciprocal lattice vectors: 0.827 0.827 0.827 10.000 10.000 10.000 Shift of k-mesh allowed. Do you want to shift: (0=no, 1=shift) 35 k-points generated, ndiv= 10 10 10 KGEN ENDS next is dstart dstart -p (13:39:37) running dstart in single mode forrtl: severe (24): end-of-file during read, unit 81, file /home/kcbhamu/pbe/pbe.rsp Image PC Routine Line Source dstart 004232C7 Unknown Unknown Unknown dstart 00444603 Unknown Unknown Unknown dstart 0040B1EB init_ 158 init.F dstart 004096CB MAIN__ 19 dstart.F dstart 00402FDE Unknown Unknown Unknown libc.so.6 1510F641CB97 Unknown Unknown Unknown dstart 00402EEA Unknown Unknown Unknown 0.0u 0.0s 0:00.06 16.6% 0+0k 96+24io 0pf+0w error: command /home/kcbhamu/soft/WIEN2k_18.2/dstartpara dstart.def failed n stop error n Any hint or help will be appreciated. regards Bhamu ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
[Wien] PBESol is not generating atomic configuration for Li
Dear Wien2k users, I am initializing a case containing Li and H. The initialization and scf goes well for GGA/LDA/PBE but for PBESol I am not getting any atomic configuration and it is empty on terminal. The error is Atomic configuration for atom: Li2 Z= 3.00 >>> nothing is written here!! while in case of other approaches atomic configuration is written for 1s and 2s states ERROR !!! nstop,iter,tets,test 362 4 9.99974752427E-007 You have to change your atomic configuration in pbe.inst atom 1 has a large sphere , consider setting HDLOs and/or larger LVNS atom 2 has a large sphere , consider setting HDLOs and/or larger LVNS > inputfiles prepared(13:39:37) inputfiles prepared next is kgen NUMBER OF K-POINTS IN WHOLE CELL: (0 allows to specify 3 divisions of G) length of reciprocal lattice vectors: 0.827 0.827 0.827 10.000 10.000 10.000 Shift of k-mesh allowed. Do you want to shift: (0=no, 1=shift) 35 k-points generated, ndiv= 10 10 10 KGEN ENDS next is dstart > dstart -p(13:39:37) running dstart in single mode forrtl: severe (24): end-of-file during read, unit 81, file /home/kcbhamu/pbe/pbe.rsp Image PCRoutineLine Source dstart 004232C7 Unknown Unknown Unknown dstart 00444603 Unknown Unknown Unknown dstart 0040B1EB init_ 158 init.F dstart 004096CB MAIN__ 19 dstart.F dstart 00402FDE Unknown Unknown Unknown libc.so.6 1510F641CB97 Unknown Unknown Unknown dstart 00402EEA Unknown Unknown Unknown 0.0u 0.0s 0:00.06 16.6% 0+0k 96+24io 0pf+0w error: command /home/kcbhamu/soft/WIEN2k_18.2/dstartpara dstart.def failed n stop error n Any hint or help will be appreciated. regards Bhamu ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
Re: [Wien] PBEsol and PBE
> 1 Apr 2018, 2:10 +04:00 от Wien2k User: > I made an optimization of a > magnetic compound with the two funtional (GGA-PBE and PBEsol) while > keeping the same input parameters (RMT, RKmax, ... etc). > Optimization with GGA-PBEsol gave me a antiferromagnetic behavior while that > of PBE gave me a ferromagnetic behavior. Maybe you have found two minimums (?). Try to start from the found solutions and continue with the other functional: the AFM in PBE and the FM in PBEsol. I think that in both functional you'll obtain two solutions and will be able to compare. Best wishes, Lyudmila Dobysheva Phys-Techn.Inst. Udmurt Feder Research Center ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
[Wien] PBEsol and PBE
Dear WIEN2k users; I made an optimization of a magnetic compound with the two funtional (GGA-PBE and PBEsol) while keeping the same input parameters (RMT, RKmax, ... etc). Optimization with GGA-PBEsol gave me a antiferromagnetic behavior while that of PBE gave me a ferromagnetic behavior. I ask you to explain to me why this difference and which of the two functional is right. Thank you in advance. ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
[Wien] PBEsol
Dear I would like to understand the GGA-PBEsol theory. What better literature? -- []'s Dr Antonio Vanderlei dos Santos [1] Links: -- [1] http://santoangelo.uri.br ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html