Re: [Wien] [SPAM?] Should the valence electrons configuration of charge transfer insulators be changed ?

2019-11-18 Thread Peter Blaha
WIEN2k is an "ab initio" method. You cannot assign a certain number of VALENCE electrons to a specific atom. Only core electrons are specific to an atom and its occupation can be constraint. The term "charge transfer insulator" describes a situation if the CBM and VBM has states on different

Re: [Wien] [SPAM?] Should the valence electrons configuration of charge transfer insulators be changed ?

2019-11-18 Thread Laurence Marks
>2) Slaters transistion state is a well known concept to calculate the >XPS binding energy of a core state, where you would remove the excited >electron from the system (it comes out and goes to the detector). It has >NOTHING to do in EELS , where the excited electron stays in the system >(except

Re: [Wien] [SPAM?] Should the valence electrons configuration of charge transfer insulators be changed ?

2019-11-17 Thread Peter Blaha
I'll add a few statements about core-EELS: 1) Core hole: In principle we want to simulate the excitation of ONE core electron into the conduction band. Thus one should create a big supercell (as big as possible, at least 64 atoms) and put a full core hole (I guess this was NOT yet mentioned,

Re: [Wien] [SPAM?] Should the valence electrons configuration of charge transfer insulators be changed ?

2019-11-17 Thread Laurence Marks
To my knowledge, the closest you can come is the LDA 1/2 method, and/or LDA (or GGA) +U. These are related to what is called the "Slater-Janak transition state approach", although not many people use it. My group found it useful for VXPS spectra of some lanthanides, see DOI: