subject:"Re\: \[Wien\] Inaccurate Tetra integration"

Re: [Wien] Inaccurate Tetra integration

2016-11-01 Thread Laurence Marks

So...no fix (sigh)? No integration should go so badly wrong On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Peter Blaha wrote: > I would not use TETRA for a 2D BZ (a mesh with "1"). The 3D tetrahedra > collapse to triangles and this leads to degeneracy and problems. > > Am 01.11.2016 um 13:50 schrieb Lauren

Re: [Wien] Inaccurate Tetra integration

2016-11-01 Thread Peter Blaha

I would not use TETRA for a 2D BZ (a mesh with "1"). The 3D tetrahedra collapse to triangles and this leads to degeneracy and problems. Am 01.11.2016 um 13:50 schrieb Laurence Marks: I am continually running in to unacceptably large errors in the TETRA integration, e.g. RESULT OF INTEGRATION: