Re: [Wien] consistent RKmax and sphere size settings

2021-04-08 Thread Peter Blaha
Three comments: RMT consistency is in particular important for total energies. If you compare the energy of 2 phases and their energy difference is just a few mRy, make sure you really have consistent RMTs and RKmax. Since the scaling with RKmax is not perfect, it might be wrong enough to

Re: [Wien] consistent RKmax and sphere size settings

2021-04-07 Thread Pavel Ondračka
Thank you Laurence, I was a bit worried because the FAQ you linked also says: "Of course you should use identical Mg+O spheres for MgO and Mg(OH)2 for consistency", so I was not 100% sure if keeping the same maximum K- vector Kmax is enough. Should I also increase lmax and lvns for the larger

Re: [Wien] consistent RKmax and sphere size settings

2021-04-07 Thread Laurence Marks
Have a look at http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/faq/rkmax.html. If (say) with an RMT for the N of 1.6 a RKMAX of 6.5 is good enough, then when you reduce the RMT to 1.3 you can reduce the RKMAX to 6.5*1.3/1.6 = 5.28. This will not give you precisely the same relative convergence, but is close.