Sending the struct file alone might not help, because how should we know
"what you want to do" ?
You have to describe your problem, say where you got the "input" to your
struct file and then attach it to the mail.
PS: Make sure to send everything only as text, no html, as there is a
size
Dear Sir Peter Blaha
Sir could you help me in this regards, should I send you the struct file to
correct it.
Regards
Sikander
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Peter Blaha
wrote:
> Your sphere radii are much too small (RMT of Mo ??).
>
> This comes because your
Your sphere radii are much too small (RMT of Mo ??).
This comes because your structure is wrong: Bohr/angstroem; wrong
positions, coordinates in wrong setting, ...
On 05/18/2016 10:17 AM, sikander Azam wrote:
Dear All
During initialization I got the following problem, please help me in
Resp Gavin abin
Thanks a lot sir.
Regards
Sikander
On 2 Apr 2016 05:49, "Gavin Abo" wrote:
> Clicked on the Google Preview button at
>
> http://store.elsevier.com/Nonlinear-Optics/Robert-Boyd/isbn-9780123694706/
>
> In the preview for the book titled "Nonlinear Optics, 3rd
Clicked on the Google Preview button at
http://store.elsevier.com/Nonlinear-Optics/Robert-Boyd/isbn-9780123694706/
In the preview for the book titled "Nonlinear Optics, 3rd Edition" by R.
Boyd, the TABLE 1.5.2 caption has:
/Form of the second-order susceptibility tensor for each of the 32
Wrong input [
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg11451.html
] can include a bad struct file.
On 10/26/2015 2:14 AM, sikander Azam wrote:
Dear
Yesterday the problem with the run -in1new 1 has been solved but now I
am facing this problem,
Error in LAPW2 'FERMI'
Dear
Yesterday the problem with the run -in1new 1 has been solved but now I am
facing this problem,
Error in LAPW2 'FERMI' - EFERMI OUT OF ENERGY RANGE 'FERMI' - STOP IN EFI
'FERMI' - ENERGY OF LOWER BOUND : -1.27904 'FERMI' - NUMBER OF STATES AT
THE LOWER BOUND : 0.0 'FERMI' - ENERGY OF
Search the mailing list archive [
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/ ].
When E-bottom and E-top are both -200, that typically indicates that
something is likely wrong with the struct file [
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg10860.html
Dear Sir Gavin Abo
Thanks sir for your help.
Regards
Sikander
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Gavin Abo wrote:
> Search the mailing list archive [
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/ ].
>
> When E-bottom and E-top are both -200, that typically
Did you check the error files (cat *.error) [
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg12460.html
]? Is your case.inorb and case.indm(c) files okay [
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg10408.html
]?
On 10/21/2015 4:27 AM, sikander Azam
Dear Sir (Gavin Abo)
Yes sir all the files are correct, but i don't know what's the reason. But
I will check it again.
Regards
SIkander
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Gavin Abo wrote:
> Did you check the error files (cat *.error) [
>
The assumption that a apple is not a sphere
Ciao
Gerhard
DEEP THOUGHT in D. Adams; Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy:
"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you,
is that you have never actually known what the question is."
Dr. Gerhard H. Fecher
Institut
Hello Sikander,
you might want to read some introductionary chapter of your favorite
book on statistical physics or on thermodynamics ... My first try at a
short answer would be: Calculate microscopic properties from a proper
Hamiltonian and density matrix for the system. Calculate
99% certain that you have an error in your lattice parameters, confusing
Angstroms and Atomic Units. You probably have RMTs of about 1.2 because you
used 4.0 au for the lattice parameter.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:40 AM, sikander Azam
wrote:
> Dear All
> I am doing
Resp. Prof. Víctor Luaña
Thanks sir for your reply, but sir experimentally silcon dioxide has 8.0 eV
band gap, but when I doped Nitrogen at Oxygen site then I get metallic
nature. This is the confusion.
Regards
sikander
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Víctor Luaña <
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:48:01AM -0700, sikander Azam wrote:
> Resp. Prof. Víctor Luaña
> Thanks sir for your reply, but sir experimentally silcon dioxide has 8.0 eV
> band gap, but when I doped Nitrogen at Oxygen site then I get metallic
> nature. This is the confusion.
Sikander,
Then you are
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:07:41AM -0700, sikander Azam wrote:
> Dear user
> I am doing calculations on silicon dioxide, but When I make the supercell,
> and replace Oxygen by Nitrogen. This give me metalic nature,
> Please help me in this regards
Sikander,
Silicon nitride, Si3N4, exists in
kindly tell how i would get master in wien 2kif you have any simple way to tell
On Thursday, August 13, 2015 4:46 PM, sikander Azam
wrote:
Resp Sir Laurence MarksThank sir for the reply.Regardssikander
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Laurence Marks
Resp Sir Laurence Marks
Thank sir for the reply.
*Regards*
*sikander*
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Laurence Marks l-ma...@northwestern.edu
wrote:
Ti is 4+ (valence), Ni is 2+. Unless you add oxygen vacancies it will
always be metallic (degenerate semiconductor). There is nothing wrong!
Ti is 4+ (valence), Ni is 2+. Unless you add oxygen vacancies it will
always be metallic (degenerate semiconductor). There is nothing wrong!
---
Professor Laurence Marks
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Northwestern University
http://www.numis.northwestern.edu
Corrosion in 4D
You must also read this document produced by Stefaan Cottenier.
http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/textbooks/DFT_and_LAPW-2_cottenier.pdf
In particular p43 and the following pages.
Regards
Xavier
sikander Azam sikander.physi...@gmail.com a écrit :
Dear all
When we plot the band structure so
Dear Azam
Many excellent books could help you to understand how a band structure works.
I recommend you to look at the following web sites:
http://www.chem.uci.edu/~lawm/Hoffmann.pdf
Resp prof
Thanks sir a lot.
Regards
Sikander
On 4 Aug 2015 10:58, Xavier Rocquefelte
xavier.rocquefe...@univ-rennes1.fr wrote:
You must also read this document produced by Stefaan Cottenier.
http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/textbooks/DFT_and_LAPW-2_cottenier.pdf
In particular p43 and the
You can read on the WIEN2k-FAQ: QTL-B page (link in the post at
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg09989.html
) about what it means to have an E-top -200.0 (like in your error
message).
In order to diagnosis why it could not find E-TOP, you should look at
In a spin-polarized case, you have to calculate both spins (up and dn),
before you can run x lapw2 -up -fermi
Probably this cannot be done directly in xcrysden, but you need to execute
x lapw1 -dn in a terminal window.
On 05/05/2015 01:40 PM, Sikander Azam wrote:
Resp. All
Calculating
Resp. P.BlahaThanks sir for your kind reply.with best regardssikander
On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 5:33 AM, Peter Blaha
pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
In a spin-polarized case, you have to calculate both spins (up and dn),
before you can run x lapw2 -up -fermi
Probably this
yes
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, kalsoom Khan wrote:
Dear all Please help me
Can we do Spin Orbit Coupling with out spin polarization.
With regards
Kalsoom
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
1. Calculate the total energy of the crystal2. and individual energy of each
element involved in the material under investigation3. Then use the binding
energy formula to calculate it
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 01:50:17 -0700
From: kkkhan.qu...@yahoo.com
To: Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject:
28 matches
Mail list logo