Dear Blaha and Wien2k users
I am still waiting a response for my query.
Thanks
*Dr. K. C. Bhamu(Dr. D. S.
Kothari Postdoc Fellow)Thin Films Membrane Science Lab.Department of
PhysicsUniversity of Rajasthan, Jaipur, IndiaMob. No. +91-9782911977*
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Dr. K. C. Bhamu kcbham...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Wien2k users
I am doing mBJ calculation for a ternary semiconductor. There are four
options for different parametrization of mBJ:
0: Original.
1: New parametrization (Koller.
2: New parametrization for semiconductors
3: Unmodified BJ potential (Backe.)
I got reasonable band gap using unmodified BJ potential, option 3, than
other options.
My query is that: Should I put unmodified BJ potential as mBJ potential in
paper or write simply unmodified BJ potential without mentioning mBJ
potential?
regards
*Dr. K. C. Bhamu(Dr. D. S.
Kothari Postdoc Fellow)Thin Films Membrane Science Lab.Department of
PhysicsUniversity of Rajasthan, Jaipur, IndiaMob. No. +91-9782911977*
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html