Hello Mako,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Benj. Mako Hill m...@atdot.cc wrote:
Users mostly read the most recent version of a given page, but from time
to
time, read accesses to the 'history' of a page happens.
At least as far as know, views to historical versions of webpages in
Hi Valerio,
Mako was referring to https://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/ and
the current logging practices. My understanding is also that these things
are not logged on a routine basis. The Wikibench traces seem to have been a
special case.
I've also contacted the researchers who
Hey folks,
I've been hesitant to chime in because there is so much to discuss wrapped
up in this question that I'd probably not get any work done for a few days
if I attempted answering it. So, I propose a project where we work
together to generate such a summary so that I can call it work.
quote who=Valerio Schiavoni date=Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:09:44PM +0200
I'm sorry to contradict you, but at least on the Wikibench traces, that
information is very well present. I see things like:
1609418296 1190438479.078
Hi
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Benj. Mako Hill m...@atdot.cc wrote:
I'm quite surprised that such informations are not known by the
community of Wikipedia researchers.
Well, my ignorance is my own and does not reflect the community of
Wikipedia researchers. :)
I did not mean to
Hi Aaron,
Is the data set from
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Desirable_newcomer_survival_over_time.png
available for correlation with the number of new articles each user created?
Aaron Halfaker ahalfa...@wikimedia.org wrote:
...
I propose a project where we work together to generate
Sure! You'll find the hand-coded set of users here
http://datasets.wikimedia.org/public-datasets/enwiki/rise-and-decline
within the next half hour (cron job copies datasets over).
*Categories: *
1. Vandals - Purposefully malicious, out to cause harm
2. Bad-faith - Trying to be funny, not
