Bumping to cc Yann on the thread as an experienced Wikisource user.
V/r
TJW/GMG
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:29 PM Jack Park <jackp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This sounds right to me. I suspect this might be the first time I posted
> here, but Stuart's comment makes sense. There really are several entities,
> such as the activities of Paul Allen's institute's work in AI and
> scholarship; but, if Wikipedia is to tie in with these cc-by research
> documents, it seems to me that many of those documents are about topics
> already in Wikipedia; linking to them, updating the Wikipedia topic to
> reflect new information by way of deep interoperability and machine reading
> techniques makes sense.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 3:25 PM Stuart A. Yeates <syea...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Given that there are organisations already organised, funded and
> > operating to preserve and promote open-access research, we might want
> > to think about focusing on getting deep interoperability with them,
> > rather than sucking all the content into Wikisource, where we can't
> > provide half the functionality that they can.
> >
> > cheers
> > stuart
> > --
> > ...let us be heard from red core to black sky
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 09:47, Timothy Wood <timothyjosephw...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This looks like a job for Wikisource. If nothing else, so long as we
> can
> > > verify their CC licensing is compatible, we can archive and preserve
> them
> > > in perpetuity on WS. Unfortunately I've scarcely contributed to WS
> > > personally. I've reached out to a WS admin that I know from Commons.
> When
> > > they reply I'll cc them on this thread.
> > >
> > > V/r
> > > TJW/GMG
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:47 PM Alexandre Hocquet <
> > > alexandre.hocq...@univ-lorraine.fr> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 17/04/2019 22:36, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 08:29, Alexandre Hocquet wrote:
> > > > >> what? then a lot of wikipedia
> > > > >> articles should be labelled as {{secondary sources needed}})
> > > > > Exactly. Sourcing as a whole across wikipedia already relies too
> > > > > heavily on primary sources. I regularly tag articles as such.
> > > >
> > > > Well, fair enough then. Good luck for your crusade, and thanks for
> your
> > > > interesting views about what constitutes primary, secondary and
> > > > tertiary. I guess I now have an answer about how much sympathy my
> > > > suggestion would bring.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ***********************************************
> > > > Alexandre Hocquet
> > > > Archives Henri Poincaré & Science History Institute
> > > > alexandre.hocq...@univ-lorraine.fr
> > > > https://www.sciencehistory.org/profile/alexandre-hocquet
> > > >
> > https://poincare.univ-lorraine.fr/fr/membre-titulaire/alexandre-hocquet
> > > > ***********************************************
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wiki-research-l mailing list
> > > > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wiki-research-l mailing list
> > > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
> > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
