Hoi,
You are conflating two things that are not related. ORES is really helpful
and there is plenty of room for it to function extremely well on Wikidata.
Yes, ORES will do good things for Wikidata but it is separated from the
proposed item quality.
When an item is created because of the
Hey wiki-research-l folks,
Gerard didn't actually link you to the quality criteria he takes issue
with. See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Item_quality I think
Gerard's argument basically boils down to Wikidata != Wikipedia, but it's
unclear how that is relevant to the goal of measuring
Hoi,
What I have read is that it will be individual items that are graded. That
is not what helps you determine what items are lacking in something. When
you want to determine if something is lacking you need a relational
approach. When you approach a award like this one [1], it was added to make
