The links themselves are [...]
So they are! I didn't realize we had a table of those. That'll be fun to
process :) But it won't serve Jake's use-case.
So, how about it Jake? It seems that you have a lot of takers to dig into
this answering this question with you.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at
Actually, the API structure has a grab all of the external links from
[page] query: I'm not sure if it can be applied to historical revisions,
but we can see!
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
These same people may have added content to
If I remember correctly the API it doesn't work well with historical texts.
I've parsed the text to find the links in when I needed it.
I can check the script that did that tonight if necessary
Finne
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Oliver Keyes ironho...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, the API
Aaron Halfaker ahalfa...@wikimedia.org writes:
...you'll need to parse wiki content in order to extract external links.
I don't think they are stored in a table anywhere.
The links themselves are, but it isn't tied to editor information, so I
don't think will answer this particular query. In
Hoi,
These same people may have added content to Wikidata ... Obviously it has
not been considered. However, you can query for these people there. You can
also query how many external references were added by bot. It may provide
the groundwork going to Wikipedias and find who did it .. references
Hi all,
There are 2000 editors who have received access to 20 different online
databases. We know the usernames of these editors and the url prefixes of
the websites they were given access to.
We need to know:
- from July 18th 2014 to January 11th 2014
- on English Wikipedia
- for the cohort of
