Apologies for being somewhat late to the party, our upcoming CSCW 2015
paper (coming soon to a research outlet near you!) took my attention, which
is kind of ironic, as in that paper our primary method of assessing quality
is a machine learner (we also use human assessments to confirm our
Hello Ditty,
It is difficult for me to understand your question if you are not more
specific of what you consider a poorly written article. Poorly can
refer her to many different things, like readability, grammar,
balance, statements supported by 'sources', good division of knowledge
over several
Hi Ziko,
You are right. But if the content of the article is very less or having
less references, less edits, less no of images, less no of links etc,
articles are of poor quality. Based on these factors, to some extent we can
find the quality of article.
with regards
Ditty
On Sat, Oct 25,
Okay. What do you think of the wikibu tool from Switzerland? It
believes that the number of editors and readers etc are indicators for
the quality, or at least a basis to discuss.
Kind regards
Ziko
http://www.wikibu.ch/search.php?search=Frankfurter+Nationalversammlung
2014-10-25 14:44 GMT+02:00
On Sat, Oct 25 2014, Ditty Mathew wrote:
Hi Ziko,
You are right. But if the content of the article is very less or having
less references, less edits, less no of images, less no of links etc,
articles are of poor quality. Based on these factors, to some extent we can
find the quality of
, 25 October 2014 11:28 PM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Tool to find poorly written articles
Okay. What do you think of the wikibu tool from Switzerland? It
believes that the number of editors and readers etc are indicators for
the quality
content and communities
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Tool to find poorly written articles
Okay. What do you think of the wikibu tool from Switzerland? It
believes that the number of editors and readers etc are indicators for
the quality, or at least a basis to discuss.
Kind regards
Ziko
http
Of Ziko van
Dijk
Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2014 11:28 PM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Tool to find poorly written articles
Okay. What do you think of the wikibu tool from Switzerland? It
believes that the number of editors and readers
I am currently on vacation and will not be able to answer your mail before
November 10. But I will get back then as soon as possible.
Best regards, Aileen Oeberst
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi ,
I am planning to develop a tool to find out the poorly written articles and
rank it accordingly. This will give a statistics about which all article we
have to modify to make it well written. Also finding good article in one
language helps to recommend that in other language where the same
Hi Ditty!
Since Aileen is on vacation (lol), I've got some references for you.
- Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., Riedl, J. (2007, January).
SuggestBot: using intelligent task routing to help people find work in
wikipedia. In *Proceedings of the 12th international conference on
Hello,
What do you exactly mean by poorly written? Dnaber presented on Wikimania a
LanguageTool to detect wordings that might be incorrect.
Kind regards
Ziko
Am Freitag, 24. Oktober 2014 schrieb Aaron Halfaker :
Hi Ditty!
Since Aileen is on vacation (lol), I've got some references for you.
What I meant by poorly written is the quality of article.
with regards
Ditty
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Ziko van Dijk zvand...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
What do you exactly mean by poorly written? Dnaber presented on Wikimania
a LanguageTool to detect wordings that might be incorrect.
Hi Aaron,
How can we evaluate the system? Is there any existing rating of articles
available?
with regards
Ditty
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Aaron Halfaker aaron.halfa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Ditty!
Since Aileen is on vacation (lol), I've got some references for you.
- Cosley,
Ditty,
Yes. See the following for discussion:
Warncke-Wang, M., Cosley, D., Riedl, J. (2013, August). Tell me more: an
actionable quality model for Wikipedia. In *Proceedings of the 9th
International Symposium on Open Collaboration* (p. 8). ACM.
Ditty,
Article quality is inherently subjective in the hard-AI sense. A panel of
judges will consider accurate articles full of spelling, grammar, and
formatting errors superior in quality to hoax, biased, spam, or out-of-date
articles with perfect grammar, impeccable spelling, and immaculate
(Ditty Mathew)
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:30:19 -0400
From: Ditty Mathew ditty...@gmail.com
To: wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Tool to find poorly written articles
Message-ID
And just to add to the complexity of James' comments; there are some people
who think that a general interest encyclopaedia should be written for a
general audience. So articles with long sentences should be improved by
rewriting into more but shorter sentences,
On 24 October 2014 19:44, James
I am currently on vacation and will not be able to answer your mail before
November 10. But I will get back then as soon as possible.
Best regards, Aileen Oeberst
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Sat, Oct 25 2014, WereSpielChequers wrote:
And just to add to the complexity of James' comments; there are some people
who think that a general interest encyclopaedia should be written for a
general audience. So articles with long sentences should be improved by
rewriting into more but
20 matches
Mail list logo
