On 17 July 2014 17:55, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Part of the problem is a somewhat subtle demographic one: while
contributors to Wikipedia do turn over, so newer contributors will not
necessarily have seen lots of surveys, very heavy editors and admins (who
are often easier
Hi Folks:
I just wanted to interject at this point that I and others are working on
organizing a conference to host the varied work of those teaching with
Wikipedia in higher education. I hope to have more details to offer soon.
Such a conference might be slightly different from the research
10th International Conference on Semantic Systems
Leipzig, Germany September 4-5, 2014
http://www.semantics.cc
Important Dates (Posters Demo Papers)
Submission Deadline: July 22, 2014 EXTENDED
Notification of
Does anyone know whether this is actually a problem with editors these
days?
Yes. We regularly see requests to survey the most active Wikipedians about
their motivations to edit. These requests are problematic for some very
obvious reasons. See this proposal[1] for an example of a study
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jonathan Morgan, 17/07/2014 23:37:
But because we /look like /an official body, it's easy to blame us for
failing to prevent disruptive research (if you're a community member),
for rubber stamping research
