On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Kerry Raymond
wrote:
> No right to be offended? To say to someone "you don't have the right to be
> offended" seems pretty offensive in itself. It seems to imply that their
> cultural norms are somehow inferior or unacceptable.
>
I'm not
It's worth commenting that link rot occurs at a variety of ways.
The obvious way is that the URL is broken, error 404 is returned to the browser.
Or but rather than send a 404 to the browser, the site redirects you to a page
that says "Page not found" without an error 404.
Or but you are
Hi John,
I suspect you've seen this already, but you can use MediaWiki's external link
search to search for links to UNESCO. For example here's how to find links to
resources hosted at en.unesco.org/mediabank in the commons:
On 06/26/2017 04:43 PM, Mark J. Nelson wrote:
James Salsman writes:
Is anyone studying the rate at which external links become unavailable
on Wikipedia projects?
There've been a few studies over the years, but none of the ones I know
of are recent. One from 2011 that
Hoi,
To what extend does UNESCO hold open licenced texts in languages other than
English?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 25 June 2017 at 15:27, john cummings wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I've been working as Wikimedian in Residence at UNESCO for the past two
> years working on a
hi John,
When you say "research project", do you mean specifically "measure the
impact of a program or event", or do you mean something more general?
- J
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 6:27 AM, john cummings
wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I've been working as Wikimedian in Residence
James Salsman writes:
> Is anyone studying the rate at which external links become unavailable
> on Wikipedia projects?
There've been a few studies over the years, but none of the ones I know
of are recent. One from 2011 that may nonetheless be interesting is:
P. Tzekou, S.
Hi James,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:04 AM, James Salsman wrote:
>
> Is anyone studying the rate at which external links become unavailable
> on Wikipedia projects?
>
> I just did a quick tally and less than 40% of the external links cited
> in the introductions of L1-vital
Is anyone studying the rate at which external links become unavailable
on Wikipedia projects?
I just did a quick tally and less than 40% of the external links cited
in the introductions of L1-vital enwiki health and social science
articles I sampled were good, and that's only counting those which