On 4/12/10 12:31 AM, paolo massa wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:45 PM, James Howisonja...@howison.name wrote:
Seems like some of these questions seem like they need data not just on
revisions, but on web visitors, and click stream patterns. Does the foundation
collect or make web
Hi everybody!
How are you? I hope happy and fine. I am Mayo Fuster Morell doing a Phd
research on Wikipedia governance at the European University Institute.
I would appreciate if you could help me with three specific doubts that I have
on Wikipedia data.
* Is there data or research results
Hello,
Gregory (? if I remember well) mentioned in August 2009 this:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1446862
All examined sites spy on their visitors, but Wikimedia and Wikipedia.
Kind regards
Ziko
2010/4/11 Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:06
I guess that Wiki(pedia|media) could very well gather statistics on
(revision_id, clicked_link)
pairs without compromising the anonimity of the visitors. It would be very
useful to have indications on which hyperlinks are most useful. For
example, I am always curious whether the large
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Ziko van Dijk zvand...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
Gregory (? if I remember well) mentioned in August 2009 this:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1446862
All examined sites spy on their visitors, but Wikimedia and Wikipedia.
It's possible
The fact that there are only a few wikimedia personell who are able to
access the information about browsing trails, and a few community
representatives who can check the IP's for registered users doesn't
mean Wikimedia doesn't spy. It spys heavily on editing, and then
offers some of the
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Luca de Alfaro l...@dealfaro.org wrote:
I guess that Wiki(pedia|media) could very well gather statistics on
(revision_id, clicked_link)
pairs without compromising the anonimity of the visitors. It would be very
useful to have indications on which hyperlinks
The first thing I proposed is innocuous (gathering stats on (revision_id,
clicked_link)), and in fact can be done easily with a minimum of
instrumentation.
The second is very different from the AOL search data. The AOL search data
was problematic because it associated data on a per-user basis,
