[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2014-01-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 Bartosz DziewoƄski matma@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch, patch-reviewed |

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2013-07-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch-reviewed

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #41 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2011-04-24 18:31:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #38) The semantic meaning of border=1 is this is definitely not a layout table, don't you dare treat it like one. The semantic

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #42 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-25 00:10:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #41) border=0 is redundant. You don't need it to achieve that effect. OK, but it makes things explicit, e.g., for Comment #10. And I don't see why they

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #39 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-23 21:43:25 UTC --- Why take away people's ability to do the first of $ w3m -dump a.html a b 1 2 $ w3m -dump b.html +---+ |a|b| |-+-| |1|2| +---+ -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #40 from Happy-melon happy.melon.w...@gmail.com 2011-04-23 22:03:56 UTC --- Because the spec says that coding things in that fashion is undesirable and deprecated and people should be discouraged from doing it. I'm not necessarily

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #38 from Happy-melon happy.melon.w...@gmail.com 2011-04-22 22:24:32 UTC --- The semantic meaning of border=1 is this is definitely not a layout table, don't you dare treat it like one. The semantic meaning of border=0 is this *is*

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #36 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2011-04-21 17:34:17 UTC --- The spec now permits table border=1: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Apr/0377.html

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #37 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-22 03:22:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) The spec now permits table border=1 Thanks for the heads up. Now we will see there on http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12413 if they

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #35 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-05 01:13:45 UTC --- And how else can text browsers still distinguish which tables really don't want borders, without implementing CSS? -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #33 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2011-04-03 22:08:43 UTC --- Oops, didn't realize it was secret. Obnoxious of them. It's not really secret, since anyone can apply to be an Invited Expert in the HTMLWG, but

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #34 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-03 22:29:08 UTC --- So then then why spitefully cause peoples pages who used it to become invalid? And if they break this, what next will they spitefully break for no reason in HTML6? --

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #29 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2011-04-01 22:19:14 UTC --- FWIW, the HTMLWG is currently debating the validity of this, under the name ISSUE-155. There's a survey up now, which will close on Monday, and the

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #30 from Happy-melon happy.melon.w...@gmail.com 2011-04-01 23:58:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) FWIW, the HTMLWG is currently debating the validity of this, under the name ISSUE-155. There's a survey up now, which will

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #31 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-02 00:34:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/155 perhaps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #32 from jida...@jidanni.org 2011-04-02 00:54:27 UTC --- I don't think we common people are allowed to comment there. Besides it is mostly over my head. However, please tell them to also allow border=0! Stop pulling the rug out of

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2010-09-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 Rodan BURY bury.ro...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accessibility | CC|

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2009-08-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||br...@wikimedia.org

[Bug 18829] Tables without explicit border attributes lose border styles when cut-and-pasted

2009-08-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18829 --- Comment #27 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-08-19 21:43:43 UTC --- Seems like a minor enough issue that we may as well stick with what the standard says, which is also fewer bytes/more elegant. We don't produce