https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #30 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-11-20
12:18:16 UTC ---
I agree with Vandenberg's proposal. His point that there is no need for an
alternative Access Control System is very important. We schould have one
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #31 from Snottygobble snottygob...@gmail.com 2009-11-20 14:01:25
UTC ---
We want the unheralded change of the last update deactivated. You've been
told, repeatedly, that you don't need a patch applied in order to achieve this.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
Snottygobble snottygob...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #27 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-11-17
15:01:32 UTC ---
I find it very interesting how ThomasV is arguing about 9 lines of code, which
would improve the extension. And his arguments, that if someone else
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #13 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 08:37:26 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=6788)
-- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=6788)
Allows IPs in Proofread.php
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #14 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 08:37:57 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=6789)
-- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=6789)
Allow IPs in prrofread.js
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #15 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 08:41:52 UTC ---
After testing my older patches on a ProofreadPage-Mediawiki Installation I must
admit, that this first patches don't work. Now I uploaded two new patches for
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #16 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 10:08:55 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=6790)
-- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=6790)
Allow Q4 and IPs in proofread.js
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #17 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 10:09:19 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=6791)
-- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=6791)
Allow Q4 and IPs in ProofreadPage.php
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #18 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 10:12:12 UTC ---
The Patches 6790 and 6791 allow in addition to 6788 and 6789 the setting to
quality level 4 to sysops, so that moving from older projects to PR2 is
possible.
There
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #23 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-16 18:41:46 UTC ---
and there ThomasV said:
Even if I am not willing to program an extra solution for de.ws,
I know that some de.ws admins are perfectly able to program the
solution they
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #26 from ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de 2009-11-17 06:22:58 UTC ---
Buxul : you misunderstood what I said. When I wrote in the
ML that de.ws admins can program the solution they need, I
was referring to local javascript, and to the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #12 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-11-14
23:36:00 UTC ---
This seems to be the solution, we have been begging for in the german
wikisource.
Could anyone be so polite to help Buxul T. to test it and if it's
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
Buxul T. bu...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bu...@web.de
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #11 from Buxul T. bu...@web.de 2009-11-13 10:23:15 UTC ---
correction:
909c909
global $wgOut, $wgUser, $wgProofreadPageAllowIPs;
---
global $wgOut, $wgUser;
954,959c954,957
if (!$wgProofreadPageAllowIPs) {
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
Thomas Bleher thomasble...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #7 from ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de 2009-09-27 07:20:32 UTC ---
I understand your point: you want IPs to be able to indicate that they
proofread the text.
I will not implement the solution you propose, because it implies to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #8 from Cecil cecila...@gmail.com 2009-09-27 18:01:44 UTC ---
What do you mean with radical change? This existes until a few days ago when
you just implemented something else without a consensus. You don't need to
implement the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wikisource: IPs unable to |Wikisource: IPs unable to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
--- Comment #5 from joergens.mi joergens@googlemail.com 2009-09-26
13:02:58 UTC ---
To give a direct replay to this comment of ThomasV, the only person I know
which wants to exclude IP'S from the proofreading process ist the developer
24 matches
Mail list logo
