[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Conrad Irwin conrad.ir...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Conrad Irwin conrad.ir...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@iname.com ---

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Conrad Irwin conrad.ir...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Irwin conrad.ir...@gmail.com 2010-01-29 22:37:01 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=7050) -- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7050) A for interest patch implementing {{subst}} This is an alternative

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Irwin conrad.ir...@gmail.com 2010-01-28 14:49:22 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=7043) -- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7043) A patch to provide this I have attached a patch which implements

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Conrad Irwin conrad.ir...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Irwin conrad.ir...@gmail.com 2010-01-28 15:20:19 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=7044) -- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7044) Same as previous patch with subst-if-substed: instead of safesubst:

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Danny B. dann...@email.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dann...@email.cz --

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #3 from Voyagerfan5761 mediaw...@technobabbl.es 2010-01-28 19:28:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Created an attachment (id=7043) -- (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7043) [details] A patch to provide this

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Irwin conrad.ir...@gmail.com 2010-01-28 20:16:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Adding a hook at this point in the parse would be similar to WordPress' shortcode system, the way I see it. That system has proven

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 --- Comment #5 from Voyagerfan5761 mediaw...@technobabbl.es 2010-01-29 03:21:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) As a feature requst, I think this belongs in a separate bug. The shortcode system looks more like normal tag extensions/parser

[Bug 22297] There should be syntax for substitution that doesn't break normal transclusion

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22297 Voyagerfan5761 mediaw...@technobabbl.es changed: What|Removed |Added CC|