https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25512
Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.16.0 |1.16.x
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25512
Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25512
--- Comment #5 from BjornW burobj...@gmail.com 2010-10-22 10:04:47 UTC ---
@Bawolff: Could you explain to me how I can safely patch 1.16 (aka the last
stable version)? AFAIK r53780 is part of it. It seems to me your patch expects
some other
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25512
--- Comment #6 from Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com 2010-10-22 12:03:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
@Bawolff: Could you explain to me how I can safely patch 1.16 (aka the last
stable version)? AFAIK r53780 is part of it. It seems to me your
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25512
--- Comment #7 from BjornW burobj...@gmail.com 2010-10-22 12:19:31 UTC ---
Bawolff, works like a charm! Thanks for your help! I hope this gets fixed in
the trunk as well :)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25512
--- Comment #4 from Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com 2010-10-21 18:40:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 7747
-- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7747
patch that removes the category prefix from the subcategory listing.
ok, it was
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25512
--- Comment #3 from BjornW burobj...@gmail.com 2010-10-15 08:12:21 UTC ---
Mhhm how can I help in determining what the cause was of the current behaviour?
I would like to have a way to remove it which is 'compatible' with the rest of
the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25512
Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bawolff...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25512
--- Comment #2 from Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com 2010-10-15 02:34:31 UTC ---
Ignore what I said about r53780. I'm not sure what caused the change in
behaviour, but that revision couldn't of been it since the old behaviour of not
showing
