https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
Reedy s...@reedyboy.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|need-review |reviewed
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
--- Comment #8 from Umherirrender umherirrender_de...@web.de 2011-01-01
20:44:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 7951
-- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7951
add param forcelinkupdate to action=purge
Using LinksUpdate is not a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||need-review, patch
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
--- Comment #9 from Reedy s...@reedyboy.net 2011-01-01 23:37:34 UTC ---
I'm just wondering about resaving it to the cache. Seemingly, the parseroutput,
and the article, aren't actually changed...
I haven't actually looked how it's used
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
--- Comment #10 from Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com 2011-01-01 23:39:22
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I'm just wondering about resaving it to the cache. Seemingly, the
parseroutput,
and the article, aren't actually changed...
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
--- Comment #11 from Reedy s...@reedyboy.net 2011-01-01 23:44:52 UTC ---
$this-mLinks = $parserOutput-getLinks();
The definitions in ParserOutput
00144 function getLinks() { return $this-mLinks; }
So it must do...
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
--- Comment #12 from Reedy s...@reedyboy.net 2011-01-02 03:34:37 UTC ---
In EditPage
if ( $wgUser-pingLimiter() ) {
wfProfileOut( __METHOD__ . '-checks' );
wfProfileOut( __METHOD__ );
return
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
--- Comment #5 from Reedy s...@reedyboy.net 2010-12-31 16:28:14 UTC ---
Indeed
Marking it as action=purgenulledit maybe
As nulledit makes more sense in the wiki community, than linkupdate
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
--- Comment #6 from Umherirrender umherirrender_de...@web.de 2010-12-31
16:46:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Indeed
Marking it as action=purgenulledit maybe
As nulledit makes more sense in the wiki community, than linkupdate
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krinklem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
--- Comment #1 from Reedy s...@reedyboy.net 2010-12-30 16:33:07 UTC ---
What's the difference between the null edit and the purge...?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
--- Comment #2 from Umherirrender umherirrender_de...@web.de 2010-12-30
16:50:11 UTC ---
Nulledit also refreshed the database table like templatelinks, imagelinks,
pagelinks and categorylinks and not only the html version of the page.
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26498
--- Comment #3 from Reedy s...@reedyboy.net 2010-12-30 20:04:35 UTC ---
Hmm.
It's doable through the interface, so the API could allow it. It's just about
doing mass null edits that we might have issues...
--
Configure bugmail:
14 matches
Mail list logo