https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #7 from Peter Krautzberger peter.krautzber...@mathjax.org ---
That's an easy macro to add to texvc.js but there are some technical problems.
Mainly, the right(tm) way of doing this in MathML would be using the frown
entity but only
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #8 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
MathML...? You're talking about the native support from browsers? Well, this
bug is talking about math inside Wikimedia/Wikipedia. And in the case when
end-user browser cannot accept MathML,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #9 from physikerwelt phy...@ckurs.de ---
MathML is part of HTML5, so it should be quite standard. And I think it's a
good idea to the HTML standard and not to invent custom notation or allow the
use of the turing complete
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #10 from Peter Krautzberger peter.krautzber...@mathjax.org ---
@石庭豐 the new version of the math extension is moving towards MathML, both
internally and externally. I.e., TeX input is converted into MathML and
rendered into image
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #11 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Peter Krautzberger from comment #10)
@石庭豐 the new version of the math extension is moving towards MathML, both
internally and externally. I.e., TeX input is converted into MathML and
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #12 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
Typo error - I wanted to write:
... in the case \overarc is not supported, I would *prefer* the TeX syntax I
provided ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #13 from physikerwelt phy...@ckurs.de ---
Created attachment 16813
-- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=16813action=edit
peters preview
石庭豐, thank you very much for providing feedback here.
Of course users are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #14 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to physikerwelt from comment #13)
Created attachment 16813 [details]
peters preview
Oh, the dollar sign! :D
OK, visually it's acceptable -- point 1 is OK
Of course users are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
physikerwelt phy...@ckurs.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||upstream
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #3 from Frédéric Wang fred.w...@free.fr ---
Is \overarc supposed to be used in math mode?
\overarc should be easy to implement in the MathJax TeX parser (there is no
upstream report so far, though). If the goal is to make the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #4 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Is \overarc supposed to be used in math mode?
I don't understand the question. If math is used, we are in math mode, right?
I want to be able to write
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
Frédéric Wang fred.w...@free.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
Derk-Jan Hartman hartman.w...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Comment #2 from 石庭豐 seak...@gmail.com ---
Not a standard symbol of what?
Nevertheless, can Wikimedia/AMS-LaTeX/whatever evolve to include this? The arc
notation is not something invented in the last 100 years. It's very weird it's
not a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
16 matches
Mail list logo
