https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41025
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Lowest
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41025
Bryan Tong Minh bryan.tongm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||13588
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41025
--- Comment #2 from Bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com 2012-10-15 16:41:49 UTC ---
Then, MediaWiki should handle MEDIA much better
I think everyone agrees there.
-
Possible issues:
*List could get very long very quickly.
*List is easy
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41025
--- Comment #3 from Subfader subfa...@gmail.com 2012-10-15 18:50:54 UTC ---
I see. Well most wikis won't be affected by that ;)
Possible solutions:
* Keeping only the last 10 and flush the rest. COuld be abused by flushing them
by adding the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41025
Sam Reed (reedy) s...@reedyboy.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|This file was used on |Track file usage
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41025
--- Comment #1 from Subfader subfa...@gmail.com 2012-10-14 22:14:53 UTC ---
I guess some may ask why this should be useful.
First of all not every wiki is Wikipedia.
Then, MediaWiki should handle MEDIA much better. Yes, MW is no CMS but it
